Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epsteinbd who wrote (468)	12/10/2002 10:00:57 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Cannot argue straight? Do not understand what you read? I will make it easy for you: - You said Turkish women "fought" for the "basic right" to wear miniskirts and bikinis. You were wrong & you could not even reply. -You said I find your posts strange "Especially when Muslims and naked flesh are concerned". You are wrong. I asked for quotes, you could not give them. - You said you "sensed a violent push backwards from the "tchador gangs" on the last elections" in Turkey. I proved you wrong by citing percentage votes where the real religious guys got only 2.5%. You were again wrong. And again, you did not reply. Instead of commenting on these points, you are making a strange mud-slinging comeback, asking me if I like "men or women or both", and calling Mohammad a "serial rapist of subteenage kids" (whatever that means). Would you like to elaborate on that? (He married a girl at around the age of 8 and did not touch her until she "became a woman" (menstruated) at 12 or so. If that is what you mean by "serial rape", this might be the only point you have in the past 10 posts or so. If not, please explain, with sources.