Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (208849)	12/10/2002 4:46:20 PM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

how about that?

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (208849)	12/10/2002 4:56:32 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 436258

well ... be careful and don't let someone bite out your middle, lower your resistance or throw you over a triangle. waves can be rough and ... tumble

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (208849)	12/10/2002 4:57:31 PM
From: Perspective	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

Not that the E-wave thread needs any defending, but it is a core piece of Elliot methodology to always have a bullish count and a bearish count. The biggest value to Elliot that I've found is in recognizing the difference between activity in the direction of the trend (impulsive or motive) and activity against the overall trend (corrective). It also leads one to think like a contrarian, and emphasizes some of the more useful aspects of technical analysis. It incorporates general sentiment regarding the phases of a market move - disbelief, recognition, and capitulation - that are definitely useful inputs. It's OK that it doesn't get much respect. Whenever anything gets too much of a following, it stops working by definition. BC