Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (155947)	12/10/2002 11:28:54 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578297

Your answer to my comment is so ridiculous, so unintelligent, so so what, and yet, you have the unmitigated gall to look down your nose at liberals. Of course. It is ridiculous, unintelligent, and unmitigated gall to point out that YOUR GUY, CLINTON, had neither the will nor the gumption to take bin Laden when he was offered up for free. Hell, at least the Bush administration lost him in the fog of war. Your guy refused to take him -- "Hell no. Get him out of here. We don't want him." The sad thing is there is no reason. The guy had committed several acts of terrorism against us, and Clinton refused to take him. About this there can be no disagreement: Had Clinton not refused to take Bin Laden when he had the chance, 9/11 might never have occurred. Think about that when you walk in the voting booth, LIBERAL!