Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (10104)	12/11/2002 8:09:57 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13815

Scott: Re Janus 20 Notice all ten of the top holdings are well-known big-caps that I have suggested investors avoid. Avoid because of the billions of shares already owned by institutions who do not have to buy any more from the public because they have plenty if not a surplus to trade and to make money on options. This is a case of the funds fighting each other over the equity value left in the market when money is not flowing in to support their trading costs . The brick of cheese is diminishing as it gets eaten away. A losing situation for most , since a diversified fund having to deal with 10 or 30 stocks is at a big disavantage when dealing with experts who specialize in each of the different issues. The "prudent man" requirement of the SEC demands that funds diversify which means they will have losers that cancel out the winners. Prudent investors should avoid them (G) Sig Nas sitting at zero change ebay, vrts, petm and symc up nicely