SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (155966)12/11/2002 12:23:43 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577905
 
Why don't you call him a traitor and unpatriotic? That's the typical name calling given to anyone who disagrees with your president!

It is a longstanding tradition that ex-presidents (particularly FAILED ones<g>) don't criticize sitting presidents publicly, and certainly not on foreign soil.

It IS unpatriotic, as it provides aid and comfort to the enemy. But Clinton set the bar at a new low; it does surprise me that Carter would stoop to Clinton's level, but I'm sure, as a liberal, he has rationalized it in his own mind. As we know, liberals thrive on gray area between right and wrong.

In my lifetime I've not heard a Republican president openly criticize a sitting Democrat president.



To: tejek who wrote (155966)12/11/2002 2:31:32 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577905
 
Why don't you call him a traitor and unpatriotic?

Just because he did things that were foolish and counterproductive doesn't make him a traitor or mean that he doesn't love his country. I don't want him accused of being a traitor I just am glad that he is not president now.

Tim