Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (155985)	12/11/2002 12:54:42 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1577864

What a pile of horse$hit....Cllinton did not have an AlQueda direct attack on the US with thousands of casualties. We had direct evidence that Al Queda was responsible for numerous terrorist attacks during Clinton's presidency. What did your beloved Reagan do immediately after the terror attack on the military barracks in Lebanon in which we lost 200+ soldiers? This was, perhaps, the earliest example of this type of activity against Americans. We had not seen it before. Reagan accepted responsibility like a man. And he did what was reasonable -- to back off and develop and understanding of what he was dealing with. You can't compare this with Clinton, 10-15 years later, with knowledge of what Al Queda was trying to do. Apples and Oranges.