Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (156009)	12/11/2002 4:03:04 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1577928

Why should Bush back down from North Korea just because they have nukes? He shouldn't, and I don't believe he has. But NK's having nukes certainly changes the nature of the relationship. I believe NK isn't viewed as an immediate threat (nor is Saddam). But we can stop Saddam from getting nukes; we can't stop NK. Were there any indication that NK planned to use the nukes they have, I have no question that Bush would be all over them. But for right now, the most sensible policy, I believe, is to try to prevent any additional metastasis of nuclear and other WMD.