Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 2:58:55 PM
From: HandsOn	Respond to of 122087

Funny? you have some sick sense of humor.

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 3:03:28 PM
From: heronwater	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Message 18324969 To:SirRealist who wrote (6) From: Midland Wednesday, Dec 11, 2002 11:44 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16 I disagree. Having had quite a few run-ins in the past especially then when the "bull" died, which was late 2000 and being harassed more than often, while on exchanging PMs he appearently did not live up to his public announcements, I doubt that. Being humble simply hasn't been seen fit (by him). Secondly, the frivulous lawsuit with Jenna is something very strange and unfitting to a perceived message board celeb (or guru),... As recently as last week I've experienced a much different and very sad feeling when I learned that a very nice guy and SI friend, David Petty died from cancer.

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 3:06:42 PM
From: peter michaelson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean you have to dis him when he's dead. My original comment that it was sad was in reference that someone's life could be so screwed up he'd resort to what he did. It's still sad. I don't have a need to find bad things to say about him at this point. Peter

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 3:10:21 PM
From: Quahog	Respond to of 122087

That is a great film treatment, but it is only great because the main character, though deeply flawed in so many ways, is also strangely likeable to us. Despite the contrary views expressed in your first paragraph, your second shows that you understand the human interest in this dichotomy.

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 6:01:50 PM
From: xcr600	Respond to of 122087

Agree with your post.. Not sure about the movie though.

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 6:06:24 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Since no one else pointed it out...your words apply to several weird characters on SI, more than you or they probably imagine.... I just cannot get over peoples willingness to give a guy a zillion chances and still get burned and say well he meant well. Yes i'm sorry for his family and friends if he had any, that grieve, but not sorry for him, he made a bad choice on top of 100's of other ones. It's a tragic life but there's a few billion people here on earth and a good many of them have it a lot rougher and they don't end like this.

To: who cares? who wrote (82272)	12/11/2002 6:48:04 PM
From: D. Chapman	Respond to of 122087

He was the Nicest Armed Jewelry Thief on the boards. PS The issue whether he was armed is subject to debate