SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RockyBalboa who wrote (17396)1/19/2003 8:30:41 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
AEP Sees Reactor Vessel Head Replacements For Cook Plant
Thursday January 16, 10:01 am ET

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--American Electric Power Co. is pursuing the replacement of the reactor vessel heads at its Bridgman, Mich., Cook plant in the wake of tighter inspection schedules imposed on the industry after massive corrosion found at an Ohio reactor.

According to plant spokesman Bill Schalk, the Columbus, Ohio-based company has recently come to the conclusion that the added cost of more frequent inspections, which can extended outages, outweighs the cost of replacing the heavy reactor lids.

"Although we haven't found any reportable damage," said Schalk, "the requirement of increased inspections of the reactor head justifies the cost of replacing it."

Schalk said the company had yet to sign a contract for the replacement parts.

"We're still finalizing the cost, schedule and final approval within AEP," he said.

Operators conducted in-depth inspections of the Westinghouse-designed vessel heads at both plants during scheduled outages last year.

Unit 2 was inspected and refueled in 40 days last January, while unit 1 was down for 36 days in May.

The outages were the shortest on record but Schalk said conducting inspections cost the company in additional contractor workers and a few extra days off line.

The announcement coincides with this week's unveiling of a series of regulatory reforms in the wake of massive corrosion found at FirstEnergy Corp.'s (FE) Davis-Besse reactor near Toledo, Ohio.

On Tuesday, senior Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials announced that henceforth, the agency would conduct more rigorous inspections, demand more assurances that problems have been fixed and act more quickly to respond to problems as they appear.

The changes, some of which are already under way, stem from a highly critical internal report of the NRC's failure to react to signs of trouble at the Davis- Besse reactor, where a large rust hole was found on the reactor lid last March.

Since then, 68 other pressurized water reactors, which are prone to stress corrosion cracking on parts made with a weak nickel alloy, have had to report on the condition of their vessel heads. The NRC has also put in place a schedule for in-depth inspections based on susceptibility to corrosion.

The most vulnerable reactors are now required to do non-visual inspections, using various electrical and ultrasonic techniques, during every refueling outage.

"Doing the inspections did add some days to the outages," said Schalk, but anticipating the need for repairs can cost money too. "In our most recent inspections we had personnel standing by," he said, "so there is an expense in the potential repair."

About a dozen vessel head replacements have been announced in the past two years and more are expected as reactors age.

"The key element is that pressurized-water stress corrosion cracking is a time-dependent degradation mechanism, which means if you don't have the cracking now there is no guarantee you won't have the cracking later," said Alex Marion, the Nuclear Energy Institute's director of engineering. "The likelihood increases over time, so you will see more and more utilities replace their vessel head over time," he said.

While most companies are reluctant to specify a dollar amount for the work, the cost of a vessel head replacement varies between $15 million and $50 million, depending on the complexity of the job and the cost of replacement power during the two to three months the plant is off line.

In addition to Davis-Besse, one other replacement is under way at Dominion Resources Inc.'s (D) North Anna unit 2 reactor in Virginia.

Duke Energy Corp. (NYSE:DUK - News) is next, with a vessel head to be installed this spring at its Oconee unit 3 reactor in South Carolina.

-By Jennifer Morrow; Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4377; jennifer.morrow@ dowjones.com



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (17396)2/10/2003 2:59:50 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 18998
 
Moody's cuts American Electric Power ratings (..again...)
Monday February 10, 1:32 pm ET

(The following statement was released by the rating agency)
$16 Billion of Debt Securities Affected.

NEW YORK, Feb 10 - Moody's Investors Service downgraded American Electric Power Company's (NYSE:AEP - News; AEP) senior unsecured rating to Baa3 from Baa2, and lowered its short-term rating for commercial paper to Prime-3 from Prime-2. This rating action concludes the review of AEP for possible downgrade. Moody's also downgraded the long-term ratings of AEP subsidiaries Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO: Senior Secured to A3 from A1), Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO: Sr. Sec. to A3 from A1), AEP Texas Central Company (formerly Central Power and Light Company, Sr. Sec. to Baa1 from A3), AEP Texas North Company (formerly West Texas Utilities Company, Sr. Sec. to A3 from A2), and Appalachian Power Company (Sr Sec. to Baa1 from A3). These ratings are removed from review for possible downgrade. Additionally, the ratings of subsidiaries Ohio Power Company (Sr. Sec. A3), Columbus Southern Power Company (Sr. Sec. A3), Kentucky Power Company (Sr. Sec. Baa1), and Indiana Michigan Power Company (Sr. Sec. Baa1) are confirmed. The rating outlook for AEP and its subsidiaries is stable. These rating actions reflect: (1) Weak operating cash flow relative to consolidated debt levels at AEP; (2) Modest free cash flow levels expected to be generated from AEP's core utility business; (3) Continued expectations for poor returns from substantial non-regulated investments, some of which may require additional funding and may prove to be difficult to sell in the current environment; (4) Execution risk associated with AEP's plan to strengthen the company's balance sheet, particularly as it relates to asset sales; (5) A continuing financial drag, particularly during 2003, from the large energy trading business while the company winds down its speculative trading activity; (6) A degree of regulatory uncertainty for AEP's two Texas subsidiaries as these utilities transition to a deregulated marketplace; (7) A narrowing of the rating range for the AEP operating utilities, given the degree to which AEP manages the utilities as a single system. AEP's operating results for 2002 were weak, including the large asset impairment taken at year-end, and its cash from operations was significantly lower relative to 2001. These results reflect substantial declines in earnings and cash flow for the wholesale power business, write-downs of investments in the wholesale business, and increased costs. Core operating results for 2003 and 2004 are likely to mirror this past year's results, with the exception that the company's decision to exit the speculative energy trading business should reduce working capital requirements for the company's large energy trading and marketing platform. Moody's notes that the actual unwinding of the bulk of this portfolio will likely occur over next two years, and may require additional funding from AEP to satisfy counter-party obligations, particularly in its natural gas trading book. Free cash flow is anticipated to be approximately $300 million annually over the next two years, a timeframe when the company has substantial debt maturities that will need to be repaid or refinanced. Moody's also notes that a number of AEP's underperforming non-regulated assets, including its investment in Fiddlers Ferry and Ferrybridge, will continue to be a drag on earnings and cash flow during 2003. The company announced on January 24th that it would be taking actions to strengthen the weakened company's balance sheet. These actions include a recommendation to the board to reduce the common dividend by approximately 40%, a plan to shed non-core assets, and the consideration of common equity issuance. With modest free cash flow anticipated for the next two years, AEP's ability to de-lever will depend upon the improvement initiatives outlined by the company, including asset sales and equity issuance. The stable outlook reflects the expectation that AEP will maintain or increase cash flow from operations relative to its debt, and will also improve its balance sheet. Moody's believes that improvements will entail reductions in O&M expense and capital expenditures, issuance of equity, and substantial asset sales. If improvements in cash flow and balance sheet improvements do not occur, this could have an adverse rating impact. The rating actions taken on AEP Texas North and AEP Texas Central recognize that both companies will ultimately become transmission and distribution businesses under the company's current plan. The rating action also incorporates a degree of regulatory uncertainty and execution risk as these companies transition to transmission and distribution businesses, particularly as it relates to their plans to exit the generation business and to address remaining stranded costs. The rating actions relating to PSO, SWEPCO, and Appalachian Power reflect some credit deterioration at each subsidiary along with Moody's view that the rating range of the AEP subsidiaries should narrow since the company substantially manages all of the operating subsidiaries as a single system. The rating confirmation for Columbus Southern and Ohio Power reflects both companies stable credit profile, and considers the fact that both companies will remain functionally separate while continuing to legally operate as vertical integrated utilities. The ratings of the following issuers were downgraded: 7 AEP, senior unsecured and issuer rating to Baa3 from Baa2, short-term rating for commercial paper to Prime-3 from Prime-2, shelf registration for the issuance of senior unsecured debt and junior subordinate debt to (P)Baa3 from (P)Baa2 and to (P)Ba1 from (P)Baa3, respectively 7 AEP Resources (gtd. by AEP), senior unsecured and issuer rating to Baa3 from Baa2 7 AEP Texas Central Company (formerly Central Power and Light Company), senior secured to Baa1 from A3, senior unsecured and issuer rating to Baa2 from Baa1, trust preferred issued by CPL Capital to Baa3 from Baa2, preferred stock to Ba1 from Baa3 7 AEP Texas North Company (formerly West Texas Utilities Company), senior secured to A3 from A2, issuer rating to Baa1 from A3, preferred stock to Baa3 from Baa2 7 Appalachian Power Company, senior secured to Baa1 from A3, senior unsecured and issuer rating to Baa2 from Baa1, preferred stock to Ba1 from Baa3 7 Public Service Company of Oklahoma, senior secured to A3 from A1, senior unsecured and issuer rating to Baa1 from A2, junior subordinate debt issued by PSO Capital to Baa2 from A3, preferred stock to Baa3 from Baa1, shelf registration for senior unsecured debt to (P)Baa1 from (P)A2 7 Southwestern Electric Power Company, senior secured to A3 from A1, issuer rating to Baa1 from A2, junior subordinate debt issued by SWEPCO Capital to Baa2 from A3, preferred stock to Baa3 from Baa1, shelf registration for senior unsecured debt to (P)Baa1 from (P)A2 The ratings of the following issuers were confirmed. 7 Ohio Power Company, senior secured, senior unsecured, and issuer rating at A3, preferred stock at Baa2, shelf registration for preferred stock at (P)Baa2 7 Columbus Southern Power Company, senior secured, senior unsecured, and issuer rating at A3, preferred stock at Baa2, shelf registration for the issuance of senior unsecured debt and junior subordinate debt at (P)A3 and (P)Baa1, respectively. 7 Indiana Michigan Power Company, senior secured at Baa1, senior unsecured and issuer rating at Baa2, junior subordinate debt at Baa3, preferred stock at Ba1, shelf registration for senior secured, senior unsecured debt, and junior subordinate debt at (P)Baa1, (P)Baa2, and (P)Baa3, respectively. 7 Kentucky Power Company, senior secured at Baa1, senior unsecured and issuer rating at Baa2, junior subordinate debt at Baa3, shelf registration for senior secured and senior unsecured debt at (P)Baa1 and (P)Baa2, respectively. 7 RGS (I&M) Funding Corporation, senior secured lease obligation bonds at Baa2 7 RGS (AEGCO) Funding Corporation, senior secured lease obligation bonds at Baa2 Moody's expects to assign a rating of A3 to Ohio Power Company planned issuance of $500 million of senior unsecured debt and a rating of A3 to Columbus Southern's planned issuance of $500 million of senior unsecured debt. Proceeds from both offerings will be used to retire short-term debt and to retire virtually all of each company's first mortgage bonds, with the near-term expectation to extinguish each company's first mortgage indenture. For this reason, the senior secured debt rating and senior unsecured debt rating are the same for these issuers. Also, to the extent that legal separation occurs, these securities are expected to become obligations of transmission and distribution companies. Headquartered in Columbus Ohio, AEP is an energy company that owns and operates more than 42,000 megawatts of generating capacity in the US and in certain international markets and is the largest electricity generator in the U.S. It sells electricity to almost 5 million customers linked through the company's 11-state electricity transmission and distribution grid.

Message 18320342