Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (67081)	12/12/2002 4:09:32 AM
From: zonder	Respond to of 70976

ALTHOUGH I ONCE MADE A POST THAT SAID A SMALL NUKE DEEP UNDERGROUND THAT HAD NO CIVILIAN CASUALTIES SHOULD BE USED IF IT KILLED BIN LADEN AND CREW. I suggest you take a look into what a nuclear bomb is & how it works, for an understanding of how disconnected the above statement is from its realities. BWAC AGREES WITH ME... That was not the impression I got. ... BECAUSE HE HAS SAID IT IS OK FOR IRAQ TO USE WMD ON THEIR SOIL TO DEFEND AGAINST US Heh. Saddam would really have to be dumb to use nukes on his own soil <ggg> BWAC was talking about chemical & biological weapons. By the way, your arguments are not more credible because you discovered the CAPS LOCK on your keyboard <g>