Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Can you beat 50% per month? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (5089)	12/12/2002 12:06:06 AM
From: heronwater	Respond to of 19256

Nice try though. ;-) siliconinvestor.com To:rrufff who wrote (4883) From: scottonstocks Monday, Nov 18, 2002 4:38 PM Respond to of 5089 And you're not one easily impressed. Since you're profile says you're an atty, how about a legal opinion on 2 or more individuals representing a competitor, with the use of phone lines/internet and along with SI's assistance, conspiring and carrying out a plan to libel my service and reputation? Their posts were so unrelenting, they even created concern over the legality of my service with an existing subscriber who QUADRUPLED his money in 6 weeks To:(Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (5074) From: rrufff Wednesday, Dec 11, 2002 4:23 PM Respond to of 5089 I had read some similar "rumors" about someone named SI Bob in the past. Are you that person? If so, would you please advise whether you had access to A@P's private site at the time that you were administering these boards. If you did, would you kindly advise whether you had to pay for the access to the private site. Thanks in advance. To:(Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (5087) From: rrufff Wednesday, Dec 11, 2002 11:53 PM Respond to of 5089 Hmmm - actually my questions were quite simple. The intent was to resolve the issue. Why would you want to resort to court action if you can provide a 30 second response here. Don't we lawyers have enough money lol? I had read some similar "rumors" about someone named SI Bob in the past. Are you that person? If so, would you please advise whether you had access to A@P's private site at the time that you were administering these boards. If you did, would you kindly advise whether you had to pay for the access to the private site. Thanks in advance.

To: rrufff who wrote (5089)	12/12/2002 12:46:39 AM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19256

Because I'm tired of nutjobs who want to portray me as some evil person that I'm not and want to try me in a kangaroo court of public opinion. The "simple questions" never end, no matter how many of them I answer. The answers are ignored and the conspiracy theories just get repeated, no matter who simply or soundly I refute them. Let them spend real money and do it right. I'll be only too happy to participate and shut at least one of these nutjobs up once and for all. But it never happens. They know they've got nothing and can't get anything on me. True innocence is a pretty bulletproof position. Let Jon prove otherwise if he really thinks he or his statements have any credence.