SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/12/2002 5:57:40 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Actrade Financial Technologies Ltd. Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

NEW YORK, Dec. 12 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Actrade Financial Technologies Ltd. ("Actrade" or the "Company") announced today that it and one of its subsidiaries, Actrade Capital Inc. ("Capital"), have today filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code ("Chapter 11") in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Bankruptcy Court"). Chapter 11 allows the Company to continue operating its business while under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. Except for Capital, the Chapter 11 filings do not include any of the Company's other subsidiaries.

Actrade also announced today the following recent developments:

1. Appointment of CEO.

As previously disclosed, on October 8, 2002, Alexander C. Stonkus began a paid leave of absence from his positions as President and CEO of Actrade. Richard McCormick has been appointed Chief Executive Officer and has entered into an agreement with Actrade effective October 8, 2002.

Mr. McCormick has over twenty years of experience in investment banking and financial consulting. His prior experience includes positions with PaineWebber Incorporated and Kidder, Peabody & Co. Mr. McCormick graduated from the University of Southern Connecticut with a B.S. in economics and accounting and received an M.B.A. from Pace University.

2. Pending Delisting Appeal

As previously announced, on October 17, 2002, Actrade received a Nasdaq Staff Determination that Actrade's common stock, par value $.0001 per share ("Common Stock"), no longer qualifies for inclusion in The NASDAQ Stock Market. Actrade appealed the Nasdaq Staff Determination before a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel (the "Panel"). At this time, Actrade is awaiting the decision of the Panel. If the Panel upholds the Nasdaq Staff Determination, then Actrade's Common Stock will be subject to immediate de-listing from The Nasdaq National Market.

3. Ongoing Audit Committee Evaluation.

As has also previously been disclosed, Actrade has ceased operating its international bill of exchange business (the "IMT Business"), which had primarily been conducted through Actrade Resources, Inc. ("Resources"), an Actrade subsidiary. Actrade's Board of Directors (the "Board") has directed the Audit Committee of the Board (the "Audit Committee") to conduct an evaluation of, and make appropriate recommendations to the Board with respect to, anonymous allegations received by Actrade relating to alleged serious irregularities and improprieties in the operations conducted by the Company and its subsidiaries (the "Evaluation"), including, among other matters, allegations relating to the bona fides of nearly all of the transactions financed by the IMT Business and of a majority of the domestic Trade Acceptance Draft ("TAD") transactions, the relationship of the IMT Business with banking and other financial institutions with which the IMT Business conducted its business, the possible affiliation of Amos Aharoni, Actrade's former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, with certain customers and salespeople and entities of the IMT Business, and other issues concerning certain of the Company's domestic accounts, including, among other things, the possibility that buyers and sellers in certain domestic TAD transactions are affiliated with one another.

In this connection, it appears that Actrade did not maintain, in the United States, appropriate books and records regarding the IMT Business. Moreover, none of the employees or other individuals who have cooperated with the Audit Committee's Evaluation have indicated any significant familiarity with the day-to-day operations of the IMT Business. Further, as previously disclosed, Mr. Aharoni, who was substantially involved in the operations of the IMT Business, resigned, effective August 21, 2002, from all director and officer positions he held with Actrade and its subsidiaries. Mr. Aharoni has refused to meet with the Audit Committee or to provide substantive information to the Audit Committee in connection with the Evaluation.

The Evaluation to date has raised serious questions and issues regarding the nature and substance of the past operations of the IMT Business, the accounting for the Company's operations, and the Company's securities filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), all of which warrant additional and continuing review and evaluation by the Company.

4. SEC Filings and Financial Statements.

During the course of the Evaluation, serious and material questions and issues have arisen regarding the accuracy and completeness of Actrade's securities filings, including the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference in such filings. In this connection, the Company is evaluating a number of disclosure and financial statement issues relating to, among other things, the past accounting treatment of certain stock options, the proper amount of reserves for doubtful accounts and the description and characterization of Actrade's foreign and domestic businesses, and other issues relating to the accuracy and completeness of the Company's prior SEC filings.

At this time Actrade is unable to determine whether the description and characterization of the IMT Business and other aspects of Actrade's IMT Business and reported financial results of such business contained in Actrade's filings with the SEC are accurate or whether Actrade will be able to obtain the information about the IMT Business necessary to complete financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

Amendments to, and/or a restatement of, the disclosures in Actrade's historical SEC filings and the financial statements included or incorporated therein are being considered by the Company and may be required.

Actrade cannot at this time identify or quantify the exact nature or amount of any amendments or restatements that may be required and, accordingly, Actrade's historical financial statements and SEC filings should not, at this time, be relied upon.

Further, as previously disclosed, Deloitte & Touche LLP ("D&T"), Actrade's independent auditor, has notified Actrade that it has suspended its audit of Actrade's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. D&T has thus far not provided the Audit Committee with information in connection with its Evaluation.

For all of the reasons described herein, Actrade has been unable to complete the disclosure required to be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 (the "Annual Report"). At this time, Actrade is unable to provide any further guidance as to when its Annual Report will be filed.

In addition, the two banks with which the Company presently has credit facilities have requested that the Company provide them with financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. As of December 11, 2002, the principal amount of Actrade's borrowings under the facilities aggregated approximately $6.7 million. Unless the Company delivers financial statements to the banks or is able to negotiate a waiver of the requirement to deliver financial statements, the banks may no longer extend credit to Actrade. As described above, Actrade is unable to complete such financial statements at this time. The Company is unable to predict whether the banks will grant a waiver and continue to extend credit to the Company.

5. Unauthorized Transfers and Disbursements.

The Company believes that, in June and July 2002, certain unauthorized transactions with respect to the off-shore bank accounts of Actrade Commerce Ltd. ("Commerce") and Resources, each a foreign subsidiary of Actrade, may have resulted in the disbursement of approximately $31.5 million of Company funds to third-parties that is purportedly to be repaid over an extended period of time pursuant to certain loan agreements provided to the Company by Mr. Aharoni. Actrade has been unable to contact the counterparties to these purported transactions and cannot, at this time, determine the likelihood that the funds referred to above will be repaid. The failure of such funds to be repaid would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. In addition, irrespective of whether such funds are repaid, such unauthorized transactions may also have a material adverse tax effect on the Company.

After being contacted by Actrade regarding what the Company believes were the unauthorized transactions described above, Commerce's and Resources' off-shore bank informed Actrade that it had frozen the respective accounts at the off-shore bank of the third-parties whom Actrade had identified as the recipients of the disbursements. While the off-shore bank continues to freeze the accounts of such third-parties, such bank has also commenced an interpleader court action, requesting that the court determine the rightful owner of the funds at issue (the "Interpleader Action"). The Interpleader Action is pending as of the date of this press release. Actrade is also attempting, through the Interpleader Action, to determine the amount of funds in the now-frozen off-shore bank accounts of the third parties. Until such information is obtained, it should not be assumed that there are substantial funds in such accounts. In addition, it should not be assumed that Actrade will recover substantial funds, if any, through the Interpleader Action. The Company is also considering pursuing other legal action in connection with these unauthorized disbursements.

6. TAD and Bill of Exchange Defaults.

As of the close of business on December 11, 2002, Actrade held $19 million in TADs issued by two U.S. subsidiaries of a Taiwanese corporation. As of the close of business on December 11, 2002, the TADs issued by such U.S. subsidiaries represented approximately 50% of all TADs held by Actrade. The two U.S. subsidiaries in question defaulted on all TADs they had issued that matured on and after October 13, 2002. On November 27, 2002, Actrade accelerated the maturity of the remainder of the $19,000,000 principal amount of TADs issued by the two U.S. subsidiaries. On December 5, 2002, the Company learned that on December 2, 2002 the two U.S. subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas.

Between October 13, 2002 and November 8, 2002, the Taiwanese parent paid $817,600 in bills of exchange it had issued that matured during this period, but the Taiwanese parent then defaulted on $354,000 of bills of exchange that it had issued that matured on or after November 16, 2002. Actrade has since accelerated the maturity of the remaining bills of exchange it holds that have been issued by the Taiwanese parent. As of the close of business on December 11, 2002, Actrade held an aggregate of $1,322,800 in bills of exchange issued by the Taiwanese parent of the two U.S. subsidiaries.

Since October 14, 2002, Actrade has not purchased any TADs issued by such U.S. subsidiaries or bills of exchange issued by their Taiwanese parent, and does not expect to engage in any transactions with any of these companies unless these defaults are resolved to Actrade's satisfaction. The elimination of the Taiwanese parent and its two U.S. subsidiaries from Actrade's financing programs will have a material adverse impact on the volume of business conducted by Actrade.

Actrade carries surety bonds insuring performance by such U.S. subsidiaries under the TADs in the amount of up to $16 million. The agent acting on behalf of the issuers of those surety bonds has advised Actrade that it is reserving the right of the issuers to contest the validity of these surety bonds. In addition, the Taiwanese parent has guaranteed the performance by one of its U.S. subsidiaries in respect of the TADs issued by such subsidiary. However, although Actrade has demanded payment from the Taiwanese parent under the guarantee, there can be no assurance that Actrade will be able to collect on the guarantee and, moreover, recent news articles reviewed by Actrade suggest that there are serious concerns about the financial condition of the Taiwanese parent. Although Actrade has had discussions with the U.S. subsidiaries and the issuer of the surety bonds regarding the defaulted TADs, given, among other factors, the Chapter 11 filings of the two U.S. subsidiaries and Actrade's concerns about its ability to collect on the parent guarantee and about the financial condition of the Taiwanese parent, Actrade cannot estimate at the present time the amount, if any, it may recover in respect of the TADs issued by such U.S. subsidiaries or the bills of exchange issued by the Taiwanese parent.

As security for one of Actrade's credit facilities with one of its banks, Actrade has assigned to such bank TADs issued by the two U.S. subsidiaries at issue with a face value of $8,661,476.49, and surety bonds insuring such TADs representing $10 million of the aggregate $16 million in surety coverage described above. As a result of the defaults by the U.S. subsidiaries described above, such bank declared a default under that credit facility. On November 22, 2002, Actrade and the bank reached an agreement addressing this default, pursuant to which Actrade repaid the $8,661,476.49 principal amount outstanding under the defaulted credit facility, Actrade agreed to deliver $3.3 million in additional collateral to such bank to secure $3 million of borrowings under a previously unsecured credit facility, and such bank also agreed to continue lending to Actrade under other existing credit facilities and similar arrangements.

Separately, as previously disclosed, a former significant customer of Actrade defaulted on $8,844,805 in TADs. Actrade carries surety bonds insuring performance by such customer under the TADs in the amount of up to $8.5 million. The agent acting on behalf of the issuers of those surety bonds has advised Actrade that it is reserving the right of the issuers to contest the validity of these surety bonds. The Company, the agent representing the relevant sureties and the customer previously entered into a Restructuring Agreement, dated October 5, 2001 (as amended, the "Restructuring Agreement"), which provided for, among other matters, a standstill period during which definitive agreements would be executed in respect of the payment of the defaulted TADs by such customer (the "Standstill Period"). The parties to the Restructuring Agreement have extended the Standstill Period on several occasions, most recently on November 14, 2002. The parties to the Restructuring Agreement have also recently held discussions regarding a possible restructuring of the former customer's obligation to Actrade, but no agreement has been reached and no assurance can be given that a satisfactory arrangement will be reached. In addition, during those discussions it was disclosed to Actrade that the former customer may file for bankruptcy in the near future in the event it cannot restructure its debts, including the amounts it owes to Actrade. Actrade is not presently able to estimate the amount, if any, it would recover in the event of a bankruptcy of its former customer. Although the Restructuring Agreement expires again on December 16, 2002, it is possible that the parties thereto may extend it again. Pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, such customer has made one payment to Actrade of $91,034.37, and five monthly payments to Actrade of $96,612.17, thereby reducing the present outstanding principal balance of the defaulted TADs to $8,544,538.10.

7. Regulatory Investigations.

On August 27, 2002, Actrade and the Audit Committee received letters from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), notifying each of them that the SEC was conducting an informal inquiry of the Company and requesting the preservation of certain documents. On August 28, 2002, the United States Attorneys' Office for the Southern District of New York (the "USAO") served a grand jury subpoena on Actrade. Thereafter, the SEC requested that the Company produce certain documents to the SEC; and, subsequently, the SEC commenced a formal inquiry of Actrade and served subpoenas on each of Actrade and the Audit Committee. The SEC and the USAO are continuing to investigate matters related to the Company. The Company and the Audit Committee have been cooperating fully with the USAO and the SEC investigations.

8. Pending Shareholder Lawsuit.

As previously disclosed, Actrade and several of its officers and directors have been named as defendants in a consolidated putative class action lawsuit filed in federal court in the Southern District of New York (the "Action"). The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that Actrade and the directors and officers named in the Action violated certain federal securities laws, causing damages to purchasers of Actrade's Common Stock during the period March 11, 1999 to July 3, 2002. The plaintiffs in this Action have been granted permission to amend their complaint in light of recent disclosures related to the Company. At this time, Actrade is not in a position to predict its likelihood of success in defending the Action.

9. Pending and Other Company Litigation.

The Company is engaged in litigation in Federal Court in Georgia to collect $4.6 million from Premier Holidays International, Inc., Daniel D. DelPiano and Amwest Surety Insurance Company. On March 25, 2002, the U.S. district court entered a $4.6 million judgment in favor of Actrade against Premier and DelPiano. On November 19, 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's decision. Actrade is pursuing the collection of this $4.6 million judgment. With regard to that portion of the case involving Amwest, Actrade is also pursuing judgment. In relation to Amwest's affirmative defenses, on November 19, 2002, the district court, while raising questions as to the validity of those defenses, allowed Amwest another thirty days to complete depositions and fifteen additional days to file any supplemental briefing concerning Actrade's request for judgment against Amwest. The parties are negotiating an agreement to extend these deadlines.

The Company has been named as a defendant in litigation in state court in California by American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania and Marsh USA, Inc., in which American Casualty is seeking to reclaim $5 million from Actrade in connection with a prior payment by American Casualty to Actrade under a payment bond. This litigation is scheduled for trial on March 4, 2003.

At this time, the Company is also evaluating taking legal action against various parties in connection with the matters described in this press release.

The litigations described in Section 8 above and this Section 9 have been stayed as a result of the Company's Chapter 11 filing today.

10. Ongoing Operations.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2002, the last period for which Actrade has filed a periodic report with the SEC, reported revenue generated by the IMT Business and the foreign salespersons who were terminated in connection with the previously announced closure of the IMT Business accounted for approximately 86% of total reported consolidated revenue of the Company. Additionally, Actrade's business with the customers who have defaulted on TADs and Bills of Exchange as described in Section 6 above accounts for a significant amount of Actrade's remaining TAD business. There is a substantial risk that Actrade's other TAD customers are insufficient to support Actrade as a profitable business.

Actrade is working to address the issues described above and, at this time, continues to operate its business (other than the IMT Business) under Bankruptcy Court supervision. Actrade believes that it has adequate liquid assets at the present time to meet its current operating obligations. At this time, Actrade has chosen not to secure debtor-in-possession financing. However, the Company is continuing to evaluate the advisability of securing such financing in the future, but there can be no assurance that Actrade will be able to secure such financing at a later date.

Actrade determined to make the Chapter 11 filings because it faces significant ongoing expenses and potential liabilities in connection with the issues raised in this press release and the regulatory investigations and pending litigations described in this press release that, if realized, could present a significant threat to Actrade.

Information in this press release regarding ongoing operations is based on Actrade's previously reported results. Reported results may differ from actual results and remain subject to the Audit Committee's ongoing Evaluation.

Certain information contained in this press release constitutes forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties due to Actrade's pending litigation, including, without limitation, the litigation described in Sections 8 and 9 above and the ongoing internal Evaluation and regulatory and law enforcement investigations, each as described above. Other factors that may cause events to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: uncertainties regarding the possibility of restatements of documents previously filed by Actrade with the SEC, including restatements of Actrade's financial statements; uncertainties regarding Actrade's ability to collect under defaulted TADs and bills of exchange described in this press release; uncertainties regarding Actrade's ability to collect under surety bonds issued in respect of the defaulted TADS described in this press release; additional facts found by the Company in connection with the issues that are the subject of the Audit Committee Evaluation; uncertainties regarding the Chapter 11 process; uncertainties regarding the Company's ability to obtain continued financing for its operations; and those factors discussed in Actrade's Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2002, which is on file with the SEC. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our estimates only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our estimates change.

MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here

tbutton.prnewswire.com

SOURCE Actrade Financial Technologies Ltd.

CO: Actrade Financial Technologies Ltd.; Actrade Capital Inc.

ST: New York

SU: BCY PER

prnewswire.com

12/12/2002 17:06 EST



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/13/2002 9:19:29 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Ptech CEO says probe put firm on ropes

By Thanassis Cambanis and Ross Kerber, Globe Staff, 12/13/2002

company run by Saudi financier Yasin al-Qadi, who is now on the US Treasury Department's list of individuals suspected of financing terrorism, channeled $5 million to Quincy-based Ptech Inc. as start-up capital in 1995 and over the next four years helped recruit other investors for the software company, founder and CEO Oussama Ziade said yesterday.

Al-Qadi promised another $3 million in 1999, but never delivered, Ziade said in an extensive interview with the Globe. He added that Ptech has had no business dealings with al-Qadi since he was placed on the ''blocked list'' of suspected terror financiers the month after the Sept. 11 attacks.

When Ziade ran into al-Qadi in a Saudi Arabian hotel in May, al-Qadi insisted he was not involved in financing terrorists and was trying to clear his name with the US government, according to Ziade.

In a three-hour interview, Ziade said al-Qadi had been a strong advocate for the company but was never a direct shareholder.

The federal probe into Ptech, which was widely reported after a search of the company's headquarters last week, has brought the company to its knees, Ziade said, tainting it with alleged terror ties, even though no one has been charged and Ziade said he was assured by the US attorney's office that neither he nor any other company employees were a target of the investigation.

''I feel that what has happened here is un-American,'' said Ziade, 38, who has been a US citizen for four years.

Ziade and James Cerrato, Ptech's cofounder and chief product officer, painted a dire picture of a company crumbling under the weight of the allegations. In the interview they frequently emphasized the company's assistance to investigators.

They were speaking out, they said, partly at the urging of concerned Ptech employees. About $1 million in contracts for the next two months have been canceled or put on hold, they said. Ptech sells software to a host of federal agencies, including the White House, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the FBI.

Without a public clean bill of health from authorities, the executives said, Ptech faces major hurdles, and many of the 200 people who have worked for the company since its creation in 1994 will be unfairly tarred by their association.

''I am right now a victim of the aftermath of Sept. 11,'' Ziade said. ''I'm damaged, I'm tainted, and until the government comes back to say something to clarify this, my life is in danger, my employees are in danger, and the people who work for Ptech might never find a job.''

Ziade said he still hopes the US attorney's office in Massachusetts, which is coordinating the federal investigation, will ''come forward to say that I'm not a target and that I haven't done anything wrong and to clarify the whole thing.''

Federal investigators do not confirm who their targets are, but people can become targets at any point during the course of a probe. In federal investigations, someone is only considered a target if prosecutors have enough evidence to seek an indictment.

The US attorney's office does not comment on ongoing investigations, but chief of staff Robert Krekorian yesterday repeated last week's official statement that ''any characterization of this as a terror investigation is premature.''

Ziade questioned the motives of the whisteblower who told federal investigators in October of 2001 that al-Qadi secretly controlled Ptech. The whisteblower, reportedly a former Ptech employee named Jeffrey Goins, continued to work with Ptech throughout 2002, even selling Ptech software to the Executive Office of the White House in April 2002, according to records Ziade showed reporters yesterday.

Goins did not return calls yesterday seeking comment. Law enforcement sources familiar with the ongoing investigation say officials are interested in whether al-Qadi laundered money through Ptech.

Yesterday, Ziade and Cerrato discussed in detail the company's financial relationship with al-Qadi and with BMI, Inc., a New Jersey Islamic investment fund that has been the subject of federal investigations and folded in 1996.

Ptech's chief scientist, Hussein Ibrahim, came to the company from BMI in 1995. Both Ibrahim and BMI president Soliman Biheiri were Ptech board members in 1995.

Federal investigators are looking at links between BMI investors and terrorist organizations.

Ibrahim, an American citizen, now splits his time between Boston and Egypt, where his family lives, Ziade said. Ibrahim, a Columbia University-educated computer scientist, helped introduce Ptech to al-Qadi.

''Mr. Qadi was never a direct shareholder in Ptech,'' Ziade said. Shortly after Cerrato and Ziade cofounded Ptech in 1994, they turned to BMI to help them raise start-up capital. BMI, in turn, introduced them to a company called Sarmany, Ltd., based in the Isle of Man. Al-Qadi was one of two directors at Sarmany.

In March of 1995, Sarmany invested $5 million in Ptech. ''Was it his money? Who knows,'' Ziade said, when asked whether al-Qadi controlled the Sarmany investment.

That spring, al-Qadi made his only visit to Ptech's offices, which were then in Westborough, and praised the company's prospects, Ziade recalled. ''He said hopefully we'll all make a lot of money with this company,'' Ziade said.

Ziade says al-Qadi never made another investment in the company after that, but continued to serve as a cheerleader for Ptech in Saudi venture-capital circles. He arranged meetings for Ptech employees on many fund-raising trips to Saudi Arabia between 1995 and 1999, Ziade said.

In 1999, al-Qadi told Ziade that he had sold his interest in the company, Ziade said. ''I have no way to verify this, because Mr. Qadi was never a direct shareholder,'' Ziade said. Asked if it was possible that al-Qadi was a secret shareholder, Ziade said, ''Nobody ever told me he secretly owns any part of the company.''

When Ziade bumped into him in the lobby of the Meridien Hotel in Jeddah this May, Ziade said, ''He told me, `I am innocent, I have no connections to terrorism,''' adding, ''I have not sought him out.''

Since Sept. 11, other individuals with connections to Ptech have come under federal scrutiny.

Yaqub Mirza, a Pakistan-born US citizen, served as a Ptech director from January 2001 until August 2002. Several business linked to Mirza were raided in March as part of the US Customs Service's Operation Greenquest, the ongoing terror-money probe.

At the time, Ziade said, Mirza offered to resign from the board, but Ziade felt such a move was unnecessary since Mirza had not been charged with any crimes. Mirza left the board in August, when Ziade decided to make himself the sole board member in order to make business decisions more quickly.

Ziade said he had heard from Ptech consultants that at least one customer was uncomfortable doing business with a company that had Mirza on its board.

Federal agents didn't tell Ptech about the investigation until the day of the search last Thursday night, Ziade said. He and his lawyer had learned the FBI was interrogating former employees and called the bureau in August 2002 to offer their cooperation, he said, but the FBI never called back.

Yesterday Ziade and Cerrato listed a host of financial problems that have arisen since the search, including the cancellation of their business account by Citizens Financial Group. FleetBoston Financial Corp. has also terminated the individual accounts of several employees, they said.

Spokesmen for both Citizens and FleetBoston said the companies couldn't comment on customer matters.

The publicity surrounding the search has scared away customers, Ziade said, with $1 million in sales through January ''up in the air, if not lost totally.''

That's a huge problem for Ptech, which says its revenue is less than $10 million.

Another blow came Monday, when Gartner Inc., a technology- analysis firm that advises many software buyers, suggested in a report that Ptech's customers ''should begin looking for alternatives.''

''Regardless of the eventual outcome, the federal investigation will strain Ptech's finances and divert its management team,'' Gartner said in the report.

Ziade said he asked the firm's researchers for a more positive recommendation. ''I told them we'll be cleared, we need your help,'' he said.

The Gartner note went to tens of thousands of other technology companies, said Richard Hunter, a vice-president and research director at Gartner. ''We would take the same line with any company that was the subject of a massive, ongoing federal investigation,'' he said.

Ziade, who has four children, grew up in Tripoli, Lebanon and came to the United States in 1985 to study physics at Harvard.

Since the search, Ziade said, the company and its employees have been deluged with threatening messages. He showed reporters a stack of dozens of abusive e-mails.

The criticism is all the more upsetting, Ziade said, because he is as devoted to his adopted homeland as he is to his Islamic faith.

''I love this country,'' Ziade said. ''This is my country.''

Thanassis Cambanis can be reached at tcambanis@globe.com. Ross Kerber can be reached at kerber@globe.com.

This story ran on page B1 of the Boston Globe on 12/13/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/13/2002 10:49:06 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Seven Indicted in Alleged $18M Scam

.c The Associated Press

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) - A Florida attorney and six other men were indicted by a federal grand jury Thursday on charges of scamming investors in 22 states out of more than $18 million.

The indictment charged Gregory G. Schultz, 54, and the others with orchestrating the sale of worthless securities between 1996 and 2000. The charges carry up to 50 years in prison.

Prosecutors said more than 300 investors, some of whom spent their life savings, were enticed through bogus documents and other promotional material from stock brokers, insurance agents and financial consultants.

As much as 70 percent of the money was diverted to bank accounts controlled by the defendants and used for purposes other than investments, the indictment said. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Runyon said he didn't know specifics of how the money was spent.

Schultz denied the allegations and said investors were in the process of being paid. ``There was no illegal activity,'' he said.


12/12/02 23:36 EST



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/15/2002 3:04:53 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Friends, foes pound table over Global Vision chief

Don Bauder

December 15, 2002

"I am pretty much of a novice" in financial matters, claims Jack Chang.

He heads a La Jolla company named Global Vision Holdings, which is developing products to help small banks do business on the Internet.

On Nov. 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission suspended trading in the stock until Dec. 9, because questions had been raised about the accuracy of information being spread on the company and one of its officers.

That officer is Chang, he readily admits. Although the company really doesn't have significant business yet, the stock got as high as 59 cents in September, as volume was frequently in six digits, one day hitting half a million shares.

The longs are sending out rave reviews, lauding Chang as the next Thomas Alva Edison. The shorts are pointing to Chang's associations. Without question, he has not chosen his allies astutely.

On Dec. 10, Global put out a news release defending Chang's past alleged inventions, but also severely criticizing some of the companies he has served in high positions.

Hear the longs: The Bull and Bear Financial Report says Global is "led by the inventor of the ubiquitous ATM machine." In small print, it's revealed Global paid for the report. Just recently, Smallcapinvestor.com named Global its stock of the month.

It was not a timely tout. The stock was selling for 30 cents at the time. On Dec. 10, after the suspension, it traded again, plunging 58 percent to a dime. Then the stock was dropped from the Bulletin Board. It closed Friday at 13 cents.

Global certainly didn't help itself in going public last fall by merging into a shell company. It chose a shell, Snelling Travel, that could have been named Smelling Travel.

Two years ago, the SEC charged a Vancouver stock tout and a Colorado shell broker with manipulating Snelling stock, running the market capitalization from $105,000 to $93 million in less than two weeks. For awhile, Rollins C. Snelling Jr. was on the board of Global, but he no longer is.

A group of consultants had told Chang they could raise him money through the backdooring arrangement, and it wouldn't cost anything. "It wound up costing me dearly," he laments.

There was another adventure. Early this year, a La Jolla company named Cyberfast put out a news release, boasting that the great inventor Jack Chang was its new chief technical officer and board member. At the time, Cyberfast was claiming it would have great returns in 2002.

Cyberfast said that Chang was "developer and patent holder" of the ATM, among many achievements.

Historians say that Don Wetzel or Luther George Simjian or John Shepherd-Barron invented the ATM. Who really knows? But Chang claims that he and a colleague were the first to put ATMs online to a financial institution's authorization databases, and he sent the SEC his patent to show it. But some question whether the system he co-patented was timely or efficacious.

But in the company's news release of Dec. 10, Chang is identified as a co-inventor of the ATM.

The shorts on the chat boards are pointing to Chang's past association with Cyberfast. In the late 1990s, when the company was based in Florida, both the New York Observer and Motley Fool wrote up the stock as a complete pump job. That was when the company was headed by a fellow and his wife who earlier this year went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Cyberfast stock still sells for a penny, but the chief executive, Roger Pawson, can't be located – by Chang, by me, or by Karen Hamilton, Cyberfast's former landlord.

"The company left on a weekend in July and stiffed me for rent of $20,000," she complains.

Cyberfast had promised Chang $2.5 million worth of stock and $250,000 in cash up-front, but barely paid him anything, he says. "In February I cornered him (Pawson) and handed him my resignation letter," he says, but he hasn't been able to reach Pawson since May.

In the Dec. 10 news release, Global said of Cyberfast and one other company Chang briefly headed, "Mr. Chang did not approve of either their stock promotion approaches or their failure to meet obligations."

But Chang has failed to meet some obligations, too. In the mid-1980s, he sold a company to what is now Citigroup. Computerized records show that in 1996, he had a federal tax lien of $326,907.

"I made a lot of money on the sale of the company," says Chang. "I made a few tax shelter investments. In 1992, the IRS got back to me and said they have decided the writeoff was not allowed. I have started to contact a lawyer to see what kind of settlement I can do with the IRS. I was just in the process of doing this when this whole nightmare came about."

The tax shelter was not offshore, he says.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Union-Tribune library researcher Anne Magill assisted with this column.
Don Bauder: (619) 293-1523; don.bauder@uniontrib.com



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/15/2002 3:48:22 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
HE WAS PORN TO RUN

By ERIC MOSKOWITZ and DAVID K. LI
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A PORN EMPIRE FALLS:
Seth Warshavsky is on the lam in Thailand, fleeing creditors like Pamela Anderon and Tommy Lee (below).
- Lawrence Schwartzwald

December 15, 2002 -- Just two years ago, Seth Warshavsky seemed to be on top of the world.
His Web sex company, Internet Entertainment Group, was touted as one of cyberspace's few moneymaking ventures. An initial public offering seemed imminent, and the entrepreneur's youthful face graced the pages of publications like the Wall Street Journal and Time.

But now, the man once dubbed the Bill Gates of porn is on the lam in Thailand, running from angry creditors and federal investigators who want to speak with him, sources told The Post.

Warshavsky's Seattle-based company was ordered by a federal judge in Los Angeles Tuesday to pay Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee $741,000 for marketing the couple's infamous sex video without their permission.

David Weeks, who represented Anderson, Lee and Poison frontman Bret Michaels in sex-tape lawsuits against IEG, called the ruling "a moral victory" because his clients would probably never see a dime of the judgment.

"We would love for [Warshavsky] to pop up, so we can help with his finances," Weeks quipped.

He can certainly use a hand.

IEG is now out of business and its once lucrative Web site, www.ientertain.com, is down. IEG's phones are not working, and numerous attempts to reach Warshavsky were unsuccessful.

Creditors, including Lycos Inc. and former IEG employees, also are looking to collect checks that are long overdue.

It's a stark reversal of fortune for Warshavsky, who appeared in the pages of glossy magazines like Time and Wired, playing up the fact that he was a 20-something millionaire many times over. He boasted about his $500,000 condo, and claimed he was, at Internet-speed, becoming a "Seth," the way "Bob" is Penthouse's Bob Guccione and "Hugh" is Playboy's Hugh Hefner.

The media hype hit a frenzied peak in the fall of 1998, when IEG published nude photographs of radio shrink Dr. Laura Schlessinger.

Dr. Laura filed a lawsuit to stop publication of the pictures, dubbed Dr. Laura's Dirty Dozen, but was unsuccessful.

By that time, according to press reports, IEG's earnings had hit $15 million on revenues of $50 million, for charging to access such sites as girlsgirlsgirls.com and sexfifthavenue.com.

The Wall Street Journal, in a page-one profile in early 2000, even insinuated that IEG may be the one of the few dot-com success stories. An initial public offering was discussed, and porn was touted as the Internet's sole profit-making enterprise.

Warshavsky even spoke before the U.S. Senate on how to regulate adult content on the Web. But by the fall of 2000, federal agencies began investigating Warshavsky, now 29. That's when things get hazy.

His luxury apartment was publicly auctioned off this past spring and IEG, one of 44 companies he incorporated in Delaware, was listed as a "surrender" as of December 2002 - meaning it was defunct - according to an incorporation search.

An IEG official said during a recent court deposition that "Warshavsky was personally under investigation and all IEG documents had been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury," according to Seattle Weekly.

A spokesman in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle declined to confirm or deny whether there is an existing investigation.

Still, former business partners defend Warshavsky, saying he is a young, intelligent guy who has not been criminally charged with anything.

"Seth is not on the lam," said Vivid Entertainment Group president William Asher, who runs an adult broadcast and video company and had a business relationship with Warshavsky. "He is doing business in Thailand."

Asher wouldn't specify what kind of business, adding that it was "similar" to his IEG Web sex operation.

Derek Newman, staff counsel for IEG from 1997 to 1999 and formerly Warshavsky's personal attorney, would say only that "Warshavsky would be great if he was just simply an idea man. He has great ideas."

Calls to Warshavsky's current attorney, Gil Levy, were not returned.

Asher blamed the press for Warshavsky's troubles. He told The Post that it was "a misnomer for the press to say that adult entertainment companies were immune from the dot-com crash in the first place," and that IEG was just one of a host of other Internet companies that went under.

When pressed that Warshavsky's disappearance is suspect at best, Asher said, "It's smoky, yes, but there is no proof of wrongdoing there."

Why Thailand? "He likes Thailand," Asher said. "There are a lot of pretty girls there."



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/17/2002 11:43:35 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Tell Tom: Canadian Scam Hits Ohio

Last month, Terry Rosteutscher opened a business that specializes in making designer silk trees and plants. "It's a dream. I've always been good at art."

But recently his dream suffered a blow. In need of a quick loan, Terry responded to an ad in a local newspaper. He filled out the application and wired the company $450 for processing fees. That was December 9th. The contract states monies will be immediately forwarded. Terry is still waiting.

"I left in the neighborhood of nearly 120 messages since this happened. Never got a call back," he said. Advance fee loan scams. It's the latest Tell Tom consumer alert.

As FOX19 has learned, the company Terry did business with is part of a multi-million dollar scam being run in Toronto. The company calls itself Northview Financial. It claims to be headquartered on Riverband Avenue in Post Falls, Idaho. But, according to officials in Idaho, there's no such street - and the toll-free number Northview uses, rings to Toronto. Canadian investigators say Northview also goes by Premium Group Financial, W. Byce Financial and Alston Financial.

Terry says losing $450 hurts. "Our Christmas is over. They definitely stole that," he said.

What the scam artists didn't steal though - is his dream. "We're still going to try to make it," he said

Canadian police say they're tracking these crooks - but because they move around a lot - they're tough to catch. The best advice is to borrow from a reputable company - and be leery of anybody wanting money up front. If you think you're the victim of one of these scams - call Phone Busters at 888-495-8501.

fox19.com



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/17/2002 11:55:38 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Nigerian Net Scam, Version 3.0

By Michelle Delio | Also by this reporter Page 1 of 1

02:00 AM Dec. 16, 2002 PT

All those beleaguered widows, complaining chief's sons and yowling high-ranking government officials don't want your assistance in getting a large sum of money out of Nigeria anymore.

Now they want to buy your stuff.

Yes, there's a new twist in Nigeria's thriving Internet-based scam operations. This time, the scammers pose as potential buyers for big-ticket items, like cars, listed for sale online.

The buyer explains that a business associate in the United States will mail the seller a cashier's check for the amount of the item plus the cost to transport it overseas. The seller is asked to wire the transportation fees to the buyer once the check has cleared so the buyer can arrange for shipment.

But a week or so after the check clears and the money has been wired, victims are notified by their banks that the check was counterfeited.

The scam has become so widespread that victims formed their own online support group last month. The group now has close to a hundred members.

Scam victims admit they initially were skeptical when the deal was brokered, but after receiving and depositing a cashier's check that cleared, they assumed all was well.

The scam takes advantage of a little-known loophole in the U.S. banking system. Many people don't realize that when a bank says funds have cleared, it doesn't mean the check is good, according to Carol McKay, director of communications for the National Consumers League.

"Under federal law, depending on the type of checks deposited, banks must give consumers access to the money within one to five days. Longer holds can be placed on deposits over $5,000, but banks are reluctant to inconvenience their customers," McKay explained.

"Unfortunately, it can take weeks for fake checks to be detected in the banking system. And consumers are then left holding the bag for the money they've withdrawn. That's because it's the depositor, not the bank, who is responsible if a check turns out to be bad."

Jeff and Shawn Mosch were victims of the scam, and they figure their bank is just as much at fault as the con artist who ripped them off for $7,200.

Shawn Mosch said she went to the bank with the cashier's check and told the teller, "I need to know when this is going to be a good, clear check -- when this is going to be actual money I can spend and it's never going to come back and bite me in the butt."

She was told her butt would be out of harm's way in 24 hours.

Mosch said she waited an extra day just to make sure, and then wired the money to the buyer. Five days later, the bank informed Mosch the check was counterfeit and her checking account was now $5,000 overdrawn.

McKay said the scam isn't limited to Internet sellers. The Consumers League is starting to hear from people who have also received counterfeit checks in connection with work-at-home offers.

"Banks would serve their customers better by explaining that they can't immediately tell if the checks are good and that the depositors will be stuck if they're not," McKay said. "In general, it's probably a good idea to wait several weeks before drawing on checks from unfamiliar sources.

"But the bottom line is this: No legitimate company will offer to pay you by arranging to send you a check and asking you to wire some of the money back. If that's the pitch, it's a scam."



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/21/2002 2:59:33 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Mum's cruel cancer scam
By GEORGE GORDON
22dec02

HOW could a mother be so cruel?

That is the question the residents of Hannah Milbrandt's United States home town are asking today after it emerged the little girl whom they believed was dying of cancer is fit and healthy.
Hannah's mother tricked her into believing she had a fatal form of leukemia -- and then told neighbours, who promptly donated $20,000 for treatment.

As part of the scam, Teresa Milbrandt, 35, shaved Hannah's hair in an effort to persuade friends the little girl had undergone chemotherapy.

Hannah, 7, even received counselling to prepare to die.

The 11,000 townsfolk of Urbana, Ohio, who rallied round to help pay the non-existent medical bills, were stunned to learn that their compassion had been so abused.

When Hannah heard she was not sick, her first question was: "Does that mean I can have my hair again?"

Last night she was in the care of relatives, her mother was in a mental institution and her father Robert was under investigation.

Sergeant David Reese said: "By the time we get done there are going to be a lot of charges here. The town is outraged.

"The mother said it started as a little white lie, then it got out of hand."

The deception began last April and when word of Hannah's plight spread, the money started to come in.

Mrs Milbrandt would tell Hannah they were going to the doctor's surgery for treatment.

She would then give her sleeping tablets and drive around until her daughter fell asleep. She would then shave her head.

When she returned home and Hannah awoke she told her that she had had chemotherapy while sleeping.

The con unravelled when teachers noticed Hannah's hair had been shaved.

Police were called and the mother was confronted. She broke down and admitted everything.

Police do not know what was done with the money.

Mr Milbrandt said: "I don't know how you can be married to someone for so long and they lie to you and you don't know."

But he is being investigated and detectives suspect a third person may be involved.

DAILY MAIL



To: SiouxPal who wrote (10828)12/21/2002 3:02:26 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Dying child was charity cash scam

JACQUI GODDARD

FOR nine months, seven-year-old Hannah Milbrandt had been preparing for her own death after her mother broke the news that she had leukaemia. A baseball cap covered her balding head and a sticking plaster marked the spot where her chemotherapy drugs were pumped into her.

So the Ohio schoolgirl was as surprised as the 11,600 townsfolk who rallied round to raise funds for her treatment when police revealed that her "illness" was nothing but a hoax - perpetrated by her own mother.

It was, Teresa Milbrandt has confessed with astonishing understatement, "a little white lie that got out of control".

Sergeant David Reese of Urbana, Ohio, said: "She admitted that the girl did not have any life-threatening disease, did not have leukaemia and that the whole story was basically made up. But Hannah thought she was dying."

Mrs Milbrandt, 35, tricked her daughter and the local community into believing the child had leukaemia to hoodwink cash out of kindly donors who thought it would help meet the costs of expensive specialist treatment.

Thinking every cent they collected would increase the little girl’s chances of survival, Urbana residents rattled collecting tins, donated prizes for raffles and attended fundraising events.

Pubs and churches held collections, firefighters raided their union funds, businesses passed the hat round or dug into corporate finances and hundreds of local children collected ring-pulls from drinks cans which they cashed in to help swell the ‘Save Hannah’ appeal.

Police say they have already established that Mrs Milbrandt, who is expected to face charges of fraud, theft and child endangerment, was handed at least $10,000 (£6,500), although they believe the final figure will be far higher. It is not clear what she did with the money. "By the time we get done, there’s going to be a lot of charges here," said Sgt Reese.

Yesterday, the town was in emotional shock. "I’ve delivered death messages that people have taken easier than some of the people are taking this," said Sgt Reese. "They’re just destroyed."

Hannah’s father, Robert Milbrandt, 44, claims he too was a victim of his wife’s plot, though police are also treating him as a possible suspect, claiming he found out a month ago but failed to blow the whistle.

Mr Milbrandt said he has checked his wife into a mental health unit and thinks that anti-depression medication may have caused her actions: "I don't think that Terri did it intentionally because her and Hannah are very close. She can’t explain it. Terri has a hard time grasping reality right now.

" I don’t know how you can be married to someone for so long, have them lie to you and you not know."

Businesswoman Tish Turnmire raised more than $700 (£450) among customers at her nail salon, cooked a Thanksgiving dinner for the Milbrandt family last month and persuaded a toy shop to sell her a discounted Barbie Dream House to give to Hannah for Christmas. She feels betrayed. "You do something out of the goodness of your heart thinking you’re helping, and you find out they've been lying to you all this time," she complained.

The deception began in March, when Mrs Milbrandt gave her daughter sleeping pills to knock her out. When Hannah awoke feeling groggy and confused, her hair was gone and she her mother said she had undergone chemotherapy. She placed a large plaster on the girl's chest, saying it was to cover the point at which the tube used to feed cancer-killing drugs into her body had been inserted, and even took her daughter to a counsellor to help her mentally prepare for her death.

As word spread and the charity appeal snowballed, Mrs Milbrandt staged hospital visits.

She would tell Hannah they were going to the doctor, drive until the girl nodded off - often helped by pills - then take her home telling her she had been treated while unconscious.

She researched leukaemia on the Internet, being careful to choose a form of the disease which can be cured in some sufferers so she could ultimately announce that Hannah had recovered.

If anyone ever asked her a question about her daughter's condition, she would look up the answer on the web. Her computer, which has been seized by police, shows she had even logged on for fundraising tips and visited the website of a charity that grants wishes to terminally ill children.

"Mom did a lot of homework," said Sgt Reese. "Nobody would have ever known."

In the end, staff at Hannah's school became suspicious after noticing that the lively youngster’s hair was not falling out but had clearly been hacked or shaved. They called police a week ago.

Hannah is now staying with relatives. "We’ve explained everything to her," said Mr Milbrandt. "She’s thrilled she's not sick."