Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (16420)	12/13/2002 12:23:40 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 57110

Where does it need to go? Continued growth and profitability Yeah, well when you have companies making up revenue numbers or turning expenses into capital improvements and putting liabilities in off shore dummy corps, with accountants signing off on the financials....anyone can get taken to the cleaners. This is why I avoid big companies for the most part. It's easier to read small companies, not as many footnotes or exotic line items that make you go "WTF is that"? I can see how experiencing too many of those can act as pretty effective aversion therapy.

To: GraceZ who wrote (16420)	12/13/2002 12:24:20 AM
From: Techplayer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

FWIW, S&P has a recent comment on the company stating that it is one of the few companies that can and should still be valued as a growth stock and assigned a price target of 26. With an estimated 42% growth rate and .53/share for 2003, the PEG is actually less than 1. P/S and P/B make it look expensive, but so what, as long as it keeps growing and does not have a blip.