SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10413)12/13/2002 1:15:50 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Some interesting comments on Enron and 'The Banks'...

Message 18334123



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10413)12/13/2002 1:19:12 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Gold surpasses $330, spells equity trouble

By: Thom Calandra
CBS.MarketWatch.com

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- It's high-alert time for investors, says a noted stock-

market researcher and strategist.

Paul F. Desmond, president of 64-year-old Lowry's Reports Inc., says investors may be losing their taste for expensive stocks in the U.S. rally that began in early October.

"Our basic position is the October bottom marked the start of a substantial rally but it is probably a rally within a bear market, rather than the start of a new bull market," says Desmond, whose research of bear-market bottoms and bull-market tops won the prestigious Charles Dow award this year for technical research.

Lowry's uses what it calls "buying power" and "selling pressure" gauges to measure stock market supply and demand. Desmond is among an elite group of technical analysts whose work is held in high regard even by critics of the craft. His research demonstrates the stock market must suffer a series of sharp sell-offs -- known as 90-90 downside days -- before buyers become eager enough to bid prices higher. See: Market destined for red-letter days.

Desmond contends the stock market's autumn rally appears to be fading. "Our 'buying power index,' which measures investor buying enthusiasm, was relatively sluggish right from the start of the

rally and has not made a new high since Nov. 6, indicating that investors have lost their appetite for stocks at recent price levels," Desmond tells me.

The researcher uses many tools to assess just how badly investors want to own -- or eject -- stocks. "Without strong demand, it will be difficult for the broad market to make any significant progress on the upside," says Desmond, whose research demonstrates the stock market hits bottom only after an extended period of feverish selling.

At the same time, Desmond acknowledges little urgency right now on the part of stock-market investors to dump shares wholesale. His most telling indicator is the 90-90 downside measure, which when set off points to investor panic.

When trading activity in stocks on the New York Stock Exchange (NYA: news, chart, profile) and Nasdaq (COMP: news, chart, profile) surpasses 90 percent of down volume on a given day, and points lost on those stocks surpass 90 percent of the total, investors are truly dumping their stocks, Desmond says. A series of such fire sales is necessary before investors are comfortable enough with the bargain-basement level of the market to search once again for new stocks.

Earlier this week, on Dec. 9, Nasdaq's losses came close to a 90-90 day. Downside Nasdaq volume reached 93.7 percent, says Desmond, who reserves real-time analysis and figures for paying subscribers to Lowry's Reports. Nasdaq's points lost reached only 86.6 percent of the total. That day on the NYSE, downside volume was 85.6 percent of the total, and points lost 86.5 percent.

Desmond says there has been almost no increase in the firm's "selling pressure index" in recent weeks, "suggesting that investors are not very interested in selling their stocks at current prices. As long as the selling pressure index does not begin to expand, the odds will favor relatively mild (reversals)."

All of this leads Desmond to conjecture stock-market prices "will probably remain in a relatively narrow trading range." He makes the point that narrow ranges for stock prices are extremely rare. "So we expect a breakout in the relatively near future," he says.

The critical question: Which way? "Although the bias is for a breakout to the downside, there just isn't enough tangible evidence, at this point, to justify decisive action for investors. This is a time for investors to be on high alert," he says.

See: Researcher on trail of bear-market bottom.

Gold casts shadow across stocks

Higher prices for gold mining stocks bode poorly for the overall stock market, says a technical analyst at Salomon Smith Barney. Louise Yamada, in her latest update, says rising gold equity prices as measured by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (XAU: news, chart, profile) could be accompanied by a sharply falling stock-market. Gold mining stocks, and gold itself, are rising sharply this week.

Yamada says the so-called XAU index, with leading gold companies Newmont Mining (NEM: news, chart, profile) and Gold Fields Ltd. (GFI: news, chart, profile), could go another 30 percent higher, to 93, from its current 72. "But what does this imply for the equity market in the near term?" Yamada asks in her update, which offers several scenarios about the stock market and gold prices. In one of those scenarios, the overall stock market revisits its early October lows.

"Advancing gold stocks over the past year have been carrying a defensive equity market message," the analyst says. The spot gold price at midday Thursday in U.S. trading rose $6.45 to $331.10 an ounce, surpassing the critical $329 level set by gold analysts as a resistance level for the precious metal.

"Who wants to pass up a trade in which the downside risk is $15 and the upside is $500 to $1,000," said Bill Murphy, publisher of the pro-gold LeMetropole Café web site. Murphy is also chairman of the controversial Gold Antitrust Action Committee, which contends governments and commercial banks manipulate the price of gold to keep interest rates low.

"The hedge-fund guys are looking at the dollar," Frank Holmes, chief executive and chief investment officer of U.S. Global Investors, (UNWPX: news, chart, profile) told me Thursday. "The whole scenario of the falling dollar is bad." The euro at midday Thursday rose as high as $1.0201 against the dollar.

"The most important dynamic affecting the gold price is, and will be, the fate of the U.S. dollar," says Frank Giustra, a director of Endeavour Mining Capital Corp. (CA:EDV: news, chart, profile) in Toronto.

Giustra, in a piece that will be published next week in the 31-year-old Gold Newsletter, says the market likely will see a return of the gold-boom years of the late 1970s and early 1980s. At the heart of the gold rally will be a rejection of the dollar by global investors, he says.

"Why is the dollar's value being challenged today? Well, quite simply, its role has been abused," Giustra writes in his article. "Since the U.S. closed the gold window (in 1971), the only asset backing the dollar has been faith in the U.S. system, which was entrusted to it by the global community." See: Brien Lundin's Gold Newsletter.

Commodity prices of many stripes rose sharply Thursday. Natural gas prices, as measured by New York futures contracts, rose to a 20-month high. Crude oil prices also rose as tensions increased in the Middle East.

In the stock market at 12:30 ET Thursday, gold mining shares as measured by the XAU were rising 6 percent. The overall stock market, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, was down a half-percent.

See: Gold gains as dollar weakens.

See: Gold's supporters monitor $330 test.
StockWatch via e-mail

You can get free delivery of Thom Calandra's StockWatch every trading day. Sign up for Thom Calandra's StockWatch newsletter at MarketWatch.com. No strings attached.

Thom Calandra's StockWatch is in its seventh year at CBS MarketWatch. Thom Calandra owns bullion.

goldseek.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10413)12/13/2002 1:20:12 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Strongest Gold Stocks

By: Clive Maund, Diploma Technical Analysis

I have compiled a list of the strongest gold stocks, broken up into several tables. One table for the best general stocks, one for the best Canadians, and one for additional Canadians worthy of consideration. I must emphasize that the list is not comprehensive and that there are some good stocks, which should be in the list, but they escaped my notice. Furthermore, the list is very basic, with little information beyond the name of the stock. I have not appended comments to many of the stocks because I have not had time to look at them. I intend improving and rounding out the list in the future. Where practicable I have put stop loss levels, in the many cases where support levels are close together or indeterminate I have put nothing. The placing of stops with gold stocks is always tricky, as very often the use of stops can result in being shaken out by a whipsaw move. My reason for making the list available at this time, before it is complete, is threefold. Firstly, I know a number of readers are looking forward to it, secondly, we are close to a breakout on many stocks and perhaps for gold itself, and finally I am going to the Phillippines for three weeks on Friday 6th and won’t be able to do any more work on it until January.

Please do not Email me about this list, in the first place I won’t be here for several weeks, also, I have only done a preliminary scan of many of these stocks, simply to determine if they have good potential, and am unable, without further examination, to provide any more information. The main purpose of the list is to provide ideas for you the reader to look into further, or perhaps to confirm what you already know.

Always keep in mind that we are dealing with probabilities and statistics here. I believe most of these stocks will go on to perform well, but that doesn’t mean they all will.

click on link for list of stocks...

goldseek.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10413)12/13/2002 1:30:44 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
More disturbing 'rarely used policies'

Commentary: Mysterious dealings are afoot
By Peter Brimelow, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:06 AM ET Dec. 13, 2002

NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Stocks staggering, gold galloping -- what was that about taking "whatever means necessary" to keep things going?

Fed Governor Ben Bernanke made this now-famous remark on November 20. His speech has been reverberating ever since. It's even caused bond baron Bill Gross to question his own market. (See my December 5 column).

Bernanke cited "several heretofore rarely used policies" that the Fed could use to stave off deflation. These involved direct intervention in various markets -- he even remarked that the Fed had ended the 1930s deflation by buying gold. (!!!)

Interventionist "rarely used policies" can work in the short-run. But in the long run, they do increase the risk of error. That was the story of the Fed's "fine- tuning" in the 1960s -- a long boom eventually spun out of control into inflation and stagflation.

So it would be disquieting to find these "rarely used policies" have, in fact, been used.

Gold bugs are particularly vociferous about the possibility of "rarely used policies" being already deployed in their own much-mauled market (see November 11 column).

Recently they've been circulating a little-noted Nov. 25 speech by Charles Bean, chief economist of the Bank of England.

Apparently, central bankers travel in herds. Bean eerily echoed Bernanke's argument that the authorities had ways of making the economy talk.

He said explicitly that, if keeping short-term interest rates at zero did not drive down longer-term interest rates, "if necessary, this could be complemented by outright purchases of longer-term government securities, or even in extremis operations in corporate debt and equity. "

Operations in corporate debt and equity? If necessary?

Which brings me to my earlier cryptic reference to Long-Term Capital Management, the troubled hedge fund which the Fed mysteriously bailed in out September 1998.

The bailout was mysterious because LTCM was simply not that big a deal. The Russian, Asian and S&L crises were orders of magnitude larger. Yet the Fed felt compelled to act.

Two subsequent books on the affair, Roger Lowenstein's "When Genius Failed" and Nicholas Dunbar's "Inventing Money," raised some interesting questions. LTCM had "strategic investors" that included government-owned banks. One participant, in a leaked memo, baldly stated that these relationships gave LTCM "a window to see structural changes" in the respective markets - i.e. insider information.

And one such "strategic investor," the Bank of Italy, it turns out, actually did employ one of those "rarely used policies:" LTCM functioned as its chosen instrument, window-dressing the troubled Italian government bond market through the massive use of financial derivatives.

"Government treated it as a valued partner," wrote Dunbar, a writer for Risk Magazine, "to be used whenever markets weren't efficient enough to achieve macroeconomic goals." (I've scalped these points from my brother John Brimelow's reviews of Lowenstein and Dunbar, which see for more detail).

That, perhaps, is why LTCM had to be bailed out.

Interestingly, a key player in all this was Goldman Sachs -- and Stephen Friedman, who was just appointed President Bush's senior economic adviser.

Any more accidents out there waiting to happen?