SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (328756)12/13/2002 2:54:37 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Re: " Those are sound arguments against it. I would guess that any claim of discrimination or undue impediment to voting would be taken to the federal courts, and that a standard would be worked out."

>>> So it would be Federalized... and interpreted ad nausium by the Courts.

>>> Wouldn't it just be better to get the overall level of Literacy in the United States up to the high nineties... and keep it there?

>>> That way, this problem - and many others - is solved without adding to a big, bloated bureaucracy... and partisan fights for generations.

>>> (If Cuba, and Iraq, and the Netherlands, and Finland, and Iceland, and Japan, and Singapore, etc., can all achieve consistently high literacy levels... all spending far less per pupil than we do... it would seem that we should be able to figure out how to do it... and THAT should be our main concern.)



To: Neocon who wrote (328756)12/13/2002 3:21:34 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I recognize that people cannot be excluded from voting based on proficiency tests. It is however, our goal for Americans to enable all of all our citizen to make responsible and informed decisions.

All noncriminal US citizens should vote. Our highest goal is to make the voting population as informed and as independent as possible.

* * *