SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (4704)12/18/2002 1:08:24 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
Treasury Nominee to Get Big Pension
December 17, 2002

nytimes.com
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

When the CSX Corporation calculates pension benefits
for its chief executive, John W. Snow,
nominated by President Bush last week to be
Treasury secretary, he will receive credit for 44 years of service to the company,
though he has worked there just 25.


Moreover, Mr. Snow's benefits will be based not just on his salary,
or even his salary and bonus, but also the value of 250,000 shares of stock the
CSX board gave him.

Getting credit for years not worked, and having virtually all compensation
counted toward pension benefits, are two of the newest trends in pay for
senior executives, said Judith Fischer, managing director of Executive
Compensation Advisory Services. She calls such deals "the eternal wealth
syndrome."


Though he has renounced his claim to about $15 million in severance benefits,
Mr. Snow's pension improvements mean he will collect $2.47 million
a year from CSX until he dies, according to company disclosures.
If confirmed as Treasury secretary, he will be paid $161,200 annually.


Among the chief executives receiving pension extras are
Gordon M. Bethune of Continental Airlines and Donald J. Carty of American Airlines.
So is Terrence Murray, chairman of Fleet Boston, the nation's seventh-largest bank.

As Treasury secretary, Mr. Snow would be in
the middle of pension policy-making as the subject
heats up in Washington. He would oversee new
pension rules announced by the Bush administration
last week that experts say can be expected to strip
benefits from older workers while
benefiting younger workers and saving companies money.


The new rules will make it easier for companies with
traditional defined-benefit pensions, which pay a monthly
sum to retirees for life, to shift to
so-called cash balance plans.
Under the traditional plans, pension benefits
are primarily based on a worker's final, and often
highest-paid, years of employment. The new plans,
by contrast, build benefits evenly over the course
of a worker's career. Cash balance plans are a boon to younger
workers, but critics say older workers could lose as much a third of their benefits.

As a matter of principle, President Bush declared at a conference
on retirement savings earlier this year, "What's fair on the top floor should be fair
on the shop floor." But an array of rules and customs have put
a distance between the retirement benefits of average workers and those of top
executives.

Most rank-and-file workers with traditional pensions receive
one year of credit for each year of service, and only their salary counts in determining
benefits. Many executives, including Mr. Snow, can also count their annual bonuses.

More unusual, according to Ms. Fischer, is the provision in Mr. Snow's
pension arrangement that takes into account the value of 250,000 shares of
stock he received from the company. That was intended to match his purchase
of an equal number of shares with his own money since 1999.

Mr. Snow declined comment on his pension arrangements.
In securities filings, CSX has said that the enhanced benefits - which it extends to
fewer than two dozen executives - are intended to ensure that they
"exert maximum efforts for the company's success" and remain with CSX until
retirement.

Experts say that in recent years, executives have sought to increase
their pensions in part to balance the risk that they will go unpaid in a corporate
failure. Unlike pensions for ordinary workers, executive plans are not
guaranteed by the government.

At CSX, Mr. Snow's pay and benefits have substantially increased
over the last five years, even though the performance of the company's stock has
trailed market indexes and other companies in the transportation industry.
According to CSX disclosures, his total compensation rose 69 percent, to
$10.1 million last year from just under $6 million in 1997.

The shares have fallen 53 percent from their 1997 high.

Meanwhile, some CSX retirees complain that their benefits have been cut back.
The company is being sued by 41 retired workers at the railroad's
Greenbrier hotel and country club in West Virginia, who say they
have been deprived of life insurance benefits.


James Hilton, a retired food storage supervisor, said that the
life insurance benefit was routinely paid until October 2001. Then, he said, "out of the
blue, CSX sent us this self-contradictory letter that says `we know you
thought you had this life insurance benefit, but really you did not.' "

The company maintains that the employees were mistaken and that
no such benefit ever existed.

In addition, CSX changed its policies, effective this coming Jan. 1,
so that newly hired employees will no longer be promised lifetime health care
benefits unless they work under a union contract providing such benefits.
Many companies have reduced or eliminated retiree health benefits as
profits shrink and health costs escalate.

Other companies have cited a variety of reasons in enhancing
their top executives' pension benefits.

Continental Airlines says that it is giving its chairman
and chief executive, Mr. Bethune, five years of pension credit for each year he works from
2000 through 2004 to compensate for the fact that he joined the company in
1994, late in his airline career.
Mr. Carty of American Airlines received
one and a half years of pension credit for each year of work until 2000,
when he traded a raise for two years of credit for each year on the job.

Mr. Murray, the Fleet Boston chairman, will receive a pension
based on every dollar he earned during his three highest-paid years,
including stock, exercised stock options and $1.4 million in deferred
compensation he cashed out last year.
Other Fleet executives have pensions
based on salary and bonus only. The bank's directors said they improved
Mr. Murray's benefits to reward him for Fleet Boston's growth under his leadership.

nytimes.com
Copyright The New York Times Company



To: Mephisto who wrote (4704)12/27/2002 3:51:47 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 

The treasure of a man

A BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL



12/22/2002

WHEN SENATORS consider the nomination of John W. Snow to
be Treasury secretary, they ought to question him closely on
the dramatic inequality of income between top executives and
average workers
and what - if anything - the Bush administration
can do about it. Snow has firsthand knowledge of the gap, both
from his compensation as chief executive of the CSX railroad
company and the lavish pension he will receive when he steps
down to join government service.

Snow
got $2.1 million in salary and bonuses as well as $393,277
worth of country club memberships and other perks in 2001. In
addition, he become eligible for stock options worth $8.1 million
and other stock awards worth $7 million more.

And while he'll forgo $15 million in additional compensation when
he retires to become Treasury secretary, he will still be getting a
yearly pension of $2.47 million for life. This largesse comes
despite CSX's inferior performance under his leadership. From
1996 to 2001, CSX stock fell 23 percent while the Dow Jones
transportation average rose 33 percent.


Snow's compensation package should not by itself disqualify him
for the Treasury post. President Bush is entitled to appoint
Cabinet officers with whom he is comfortable, and Snow has spent
years in Washington as a transportation official and lobbyist.

And his pay package from CSX is hardly unusual. In the last
decade, according to BusinessWeek magazine, the pay of CEOs at
top companies increased by 340 percent, compared with 36
percent for an average factory worker. As of 2001, the ratio
between the average chief executive's compensation and the
average worker's stood at 411 to 1, compared with 42 to 1 in 1980.

Economists are debating the reason for this rich-get-richer
phenomenon, but government has the ability to counteract the
growing inequality if it has the will. Bush, however, has secured
the passage of tax cuts that are tilted toward people in Snow's
top-tier income bracket.


It makes sense to use stock options to encourage executives to pay
better attention to the company bottom line, but disproportionate
awards fuel little but individual greed. To right the balance, the
federal government should skew tax cuts and other stimulus
measures to Americans of limited means. This ought to be done
without threatening the ability of the government to protect the
long-term solvency of Social Security, the most successful
program of income support in the history of the country.


The man who would be chief financial officer of the United States
ought to be asked about the importance of equity in the formation
of economic policy. Senators on the Finance Committee, who will
be examining Snow's appointment, ought to speak up for those who
lack the advantages of a $2.47 million-a-year pension.

This story ran on page D10 of the Boston Globe on 12/22/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.

boston.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (4704)12/30/2002 11:49:23 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
Hundreds of rail workers blame solvents for
illness


"Over the past 15 years, railroad companies, particularly
CSX Transportation Inc., have paid tens of millions of
dollars to settle workers' solvent lawsuits, while denying
any link between exposure and brain damage. "


Sunday, May 13, 2001

By James Bruggers and Sara Shipley, The Courier-Journal

courier-journal.com

They were a generation
of workers who believed
in loyalty, hard work and
the railroad of their
fathers.


None suspected that the
powerful cleaning
solvents they splashed
and sprayed on
locomotives in the
1960s, '70s and '80s
were making them sick.

But in a 10-month investigation, The Courier-Journal
found that more than 600 railroaders, from Maryland to
Kentucky to Montana, have been diagnosed with brain
damage from their long-term exposure to toxic degreasing
solvents.

Thousands more may be ill and not realize why.

Over the past 15 years, railroad companies, particularly
CSX Transportation Inc., have paid tens of millions of
dollars to settle workers' solvent lawsuits, while denying
any link between exposure and brain damage.

But it's not only railroaders who are getting sick.


Millions of Americans are exposed to some of these same
solvents and other related chemicals daily in such
occupations as dry cleaning and industrial painting,
others through common household products, such as
paint thinners.
Some workers also have been diagnosed
with the same ailment as the railroaders: toxic
encephalopathy.

The federal government is charged with protecting the
public against toxic exposure to chemicals,
but it is
handcuffed by ineffective laws, tight budgets and the
sheer volume of new chemicals entering the marketplace
each year.

Today, in the first of a four-day series, The
CourierJournal details:

How, despite medical warnings, the railroad industry in
the 1960s, '70s and '80s allowed the heavy and largely
unprotected use of toxic chlorinated solvents.

How respirators were required by the government but
not mandated by CSX and the railroads it absorbed for
more than a decade.


How the railroads resisted government inspections of
maintenance shops for almost a decade during a
jurisdictional dispute.

CSX contends workers have exaggerated their stories of
working conditions and illness. But the claims of hardship
told to The Courier-Journal by lawyers, doctors and the
workers themselves reflect a deep belief that solvent use
has wrecked lives.


''You have divorces. You have suicides. You have criminal
activity,'' said attorney Larry W. Lockwood Jr. of Virginia
Beach, Va., who has represented workers. ''I've heard so
many stories I've gotten numb to them.''

[ Additional Stories at CJ website]



To: Mephisto who wrote (4704)1/23/2003 12:19:16 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
Carlyle Group Buying CSX Lines for $300M
siliconinvestor.com

12/17/2002 22:21:53 EST

CSX Corp. said Tuesday it will sell its domestic container shipping unit to The Carlyle
Group for approximately $300 million in cash and securities.

CSX Lines, based in Charlotte, N.C., will retain its management team but be renamed
Horizon Lines.

CSX Lines has 17 U.S. flag vessels and 22,000 containers. The nation's largest ocean
transport company provides ocean transportation and logistics services to and from the
continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and Puerto Rico.

The Carlyle Group is a global private equity firm with more than $13.9 billion under
management. Its U.S. Buyout Fund will supply equity for the deal, while financing will
come from ABN AMRO Bank. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter of
2003, the companies said.

"CSX Lines is a well-managed company that has a bright future," Carlyle managing
director Greg Ledford said in a statement.

CSX Corp. President Michael J. Ward called the development "a terrific transaction for
all parties. Completion of this transaction is consistent with our oft and long-stated
strategy of becoming a more rail-based organization."

CSX Corp., based in Richmond, operates a major rail network covering the eastern half
of the United States. It also owns CSX World Terminals, which manages and has
substantial interests in container terminals in Asia, Europe, and Latin America.

Last week, President Bush named John Snow, chairman and chief executive of CSX
since 1991, to succeed Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill.



To: Mephisto who wrote (4704)3/11/2003 12:54:42 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
Rowe Took A Bit Too Much
March 7, 2003

Here we go again. A Hartford-based company on the
Fortune 100 list announces a big raise for its chief
executive after executing several thousand layoffs last
year.


Two weeks ago it was George David at United
Technologies. Now it's Dr. John W. Rowe at Aetna Inc.
This is it, though; after these two, we're fresh out of giant
companies with mass layoffs.


Rowe, like David, is chairman of the board that pays him,
although neither man votes on his own salary. A modest
boost to match the hard times in 2002, you might think?
Try a 160 percent increase, from $3.4 million in 2001 to
$8.9 million in 2002 - not including stock options.


Some Aetna people are shaking their heads, especially
since Rowe recently cut health benefits to future retirees
on top of carrying out the better part of 7,800 layoffs in the
last 18 months. That's 7,800 lives thrown upside-down,
most of them with folks at home counting on them. Think
of it this way: Rowe earned $1,000 for every layoff, in rough
terms, plus $1 million.


Sounds crazy, huh? This may sound crazier: Jack Rowe
deserved a big raise, though not the prodigious jackpot he
accepted.

The health insurer recruited Rowe in the summer of 2000
from his job running a not-for-profit New York City hospital
system. Aetna had just agreed to sell its financial services
and foreign units to ING Group for $8 billion. More
important to Aetna going forward, the company was
attempting to turn losses into profits by shrinking its core
business, from a late-1999 peak of 21 million people
covered.

The idea was to shed unprofitable business across the
country, mostly by raising prices.

As of the end of 2002, Aetna insured 13.7 million people.
It's no longer the nation's largest health insurer. Its payroll
has dropped from 40,000 in 2000 to 28,500 as it has
hired thousands of people, but not as many as it laid off
and lost in the ING sale.

And under Rowe, 58, Aetna moved from a $63 million loss
in operations in 2001 to a $450 million profit last year.
Shares in Aetna rose by 25 percent last year, a down year
for most issues.

Rowe, in short, walked into a situation in which the whole
point was to pare jobs, not just to boost profits, but also to
change the nature of the company. And he did that.

Moreover, Aetna employees - the ones that remain - have
not had their pay frozen. The average increase last year
was 3.7 percent, spokesman Fred Laberge said. Annual
bonuses increased for rank-and-file workers, and Aetna
also gave stock options to all regular staff members,
although the workweek was increased from 37½ hours to
40 hours.

In 2002, Aetna restored its matching grants for 401(k)
retirement plans to 100 percent, from 50 percent, for up to
6 percent of an employee's pay. And it maintains a
traditional pension plan, as well.

"The good fortune of the company was shared," Laberge
said.

Looking ahead, the company has no plans for more major
layoffs, Laberge said. That, of course, can change any
time at Aetna or any other company.

Rowe, to his credit, has also moved to ease back on
Aetna's highly restrictive "poison pill" takeover defense.

One year ago, some shareholders criticized Aetna's wall
of protection, which made a hostile takeover all but
impossible. That may be good for Connecticut, which
would lose if another company swallowed Aetna, but it's
bad for shareholders, and ultimately bad for business.
Shareholders next month will vote on a plan which would,
among other things, require a simple majority of shares
voting to approve a merger, rather than two-thirds of
shares voting.

Speaking of Connecticut, the local layoffs under Rowe
have been less than they might have been. Among 10,000
job cuts announced since December, 2001 - mostly
layoffs - 10 percent have been in Connecticut, where more
than a quarter of the Aetna staff works.

Rowe in 2002 received a salary of $1 million, the same as
in 2001, and other compensation totaling $228,000,
including use of the company jet. His bonus jumped from
$1 million to $2.5 million, and his "long-term incentive"
payout last year was $5.2 million, up from zero in 2001.
During 2001 he also received $1.4 million from his
signing bonus.


Separately, Rowe received options to buy 350,000 Aetna
shares in January 2002 that had a theoretical value of
$5.4 million at the time of the grant.

Ronald A. Williams, who was promoted to president from
executive vice president in 2002, was paid a total of $6.1
million in 2002.

Rowe's direct pay may be a record for Aetna, for ongoing
chief executives. But this is the company that paid William
Donaldson, now head of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, a $12 million parting gift in the
year when he stepped down as CEO in 2000.

Rowe, in the end, did deserve a nice raise last year.
Because of the layoffs, though, he should have signaled
his board's compensation committee that he wanted a
more modest bump.

Maybe next year he'll do that. And maybe Rowe, who still
has a residence in New York as well as in Greater
Hartford, will move to Connecticut outright and spend
more of that money here.

Dan Haar can be reached at haar@courant.com or by
calling 860-241-6536.

E-mail: haar@courant.com

ctnow.com