SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (61606)12/13/2002 7:53:54 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi CobaltBlue; I don't mean to argue that the US is bound to treaties that it has only signed, though there is a certain amount of implication re that.

I see you seem to be giving up on your declaration that "signatory" implies "ratification" by redirecting the topic. Cool.

-- Carl



To: Ilaine who wrote (61606)12/13/2002 11:27:15 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
<Until and unless it is ratified by Congress, the signature of the President or his representative has no legally binding effect.>

I tried discussing this yesterday...

So, are you saying Rumsfeld signing a piece of paper with Qatar is worth less than my toilet paper ?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News