SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10454)12/14/2002 1:27:07 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
A Sampling of Advisory Opinion...

CrossCurrents
HD Brous & Co.
40 Cuttermill Road
Great Neck, N.Y. 11021
E-mail: crosscurrents@hdbrous.com

DEC. 9 ~ Rummaging through the vast arrays of recent market commentaries, we have been astounded to see that the four most compelling reasons to be in stocks cited by most analysts have nothing at all to do with corporate prospects or economic recovery. The reasons we have seen listed are the typical October bottom, the seasonal aspects that favor November through April, the third year of the Presidential cycle and the fact that stocks have been down for three years in a row (not yet, but they're counting). At first glance, the odds would appear to be overwhelmingly in favor of the bulls. But the apparent math is quite meaningless in the face of the details and, as we all know, the devil is in the details... The fundamentals are quite clear; stocks are still grossly overvalued on any number of counts, so why buy them?

-- Alan M. Newman
_________________________________
The Aden Forecast
Aden Research, Dept. SJO874
P.O. Box 025216
Miami, Fla. 33102
Web: adenforecast.com

DEC. ~ The major trends are solidly in place and will likely carry into 2003.... up for gold, gold shares and the major currencies, and down for U.S. and international stock markets, and the dollar. This is where your investment focus should be. The bond market's major trend is still up and we're staying with our position, but it looks like the rise is maturing. Our overall portfolio breakdown remains as follows: 25% cash (euros, British pounds, Swiss francs, New Zealand and Australian dollars, CDs and bonds), 25% U.S. government bonds, 50% gold shares, gold and silver.

-- Mary Anne and Pamela Aden

______________________________________
Marder on the Market
Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management
590 Madison Ave.
New York, N.Y. 10022
E-mail: kmarder@ladenburg.com

DEC. 9 ~ Although the gains in beaten-down techs have looked good on the surface, for the investor who favors fundamentally sound growth stocks emerging from constructive price bases, this is tantamount to a "kissing-your-sister" market.

-- Kevin N. Marder

___________________________________
Prudent Market Decisions
4 Cortland Lane
Greenville, R.I. 02828
E-mail: pmd10@aol.com

DEC. 9 ~ The market has had a nice rally off the October lows and is entitled to pause and regroup, which increases the chances for a longer-term move. The weekly-investor sentiment survey by the American Association of Individual Investors shows the eight-week moving average of bullish investors at 49% for the week ending Dec. 5. Last year, after the September low, it took approximately the same amount of rally time to reach this level of bullishness in the AAII survey (11/22/01). While the level is relatively high, a few more months of upside potential, at the minimum, should be possible. One good sign is that NYSE members are shorting significantly less in this rally than they were in the 2001 rally. Nevertheless, it is still prudent to keep in mind that terrorism and/or the Iraq situation are wild cards that could instantaneously derail the upmove. Current Strategy: We do not think there is much more potential than Dow 10,900 and would be looking to take advantage of any strength over the next 6-12 months to exit positions.

-- Carl Ruhle

________________________________
The Savvy Macrowave Investor
20348 Sun Valley Drive
Laguna Beach, Calif. 92651

DEC. 9 ~ The stock market won't fully recover until the economy does. The economy won't recover until an inept Bush White House, a temporizing Greenspan Fed, and a dysfunctional "Republicrat" Congress realize that the old non-cooperative ways of stimulating recovery won't work in the new "Bin Laden" economy.

On top of a faltering consumer, frozen business executives, and fiscally irresponsible politicians, higher oil prices have been highly contractionary. Germany is falling into a funk that may drag down Europe. Japan remains the basket case of Asia. The result is falling U.S. exports, and a rising trade deficit. The resultant weakening dollar has undermined the stock market.

The final barrier to recovery is terrorism. It's not just that war with Iraq is all but inevitable and the outcome is uncertain. Seemingly every day, the Jihadists open a new front -- from heavenly Bali to the Hell of an AIDS and corruption-wracked Africa.

-- Peter Navarro



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10454)12/14/2002 1:52:13 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Samurai Mike?

Japan seeks advice from -- who else? -- Michael Milken on setting up a junk-bond market

By NEIL A. MARTIN
Barron's
December 16th, 2002

Back in the 'eighties, American companies eagerly adopted Japanese management techniques as the new paradigm. Now, Japan may be about to adopt a prominent feature of that decade from the U.S. -- junk bonds -- with the help of none other than Michael Milken.


Milken, of course, was the father of the modern junk-bond market. As head of the high-yield department at Drexel Burnham Lambert, he oversaw the market's boom in the 1980s but later went to prison in 1991 for violating securities laws. Drexel declared bankruptcy in 1990 when it was unable to pay $2 billion in liabilities, including a $650 million government fine, when the junk market collapsed.

A small but growing number of Japanese government and private financial officials, securities executives and academics are calling for the establishment of a junk-bond market in Japan, hoping it will help invigorate their nation's moribund economy, much as junk bonds did in the U.S. two decades ago.

"We have a quite large universe of low-level corporate bonds that are floundering at the bottom of the bond market with nowhere to go because we don't have a market mechanism to trade them," says Yoshio Shima, head of the credit-research division at Deutsche Securities in Tokyo. "As a result, more and more people are feeling the necessity to move the idea of a junk-bond market forward."

Shima believes that one in four corporate bonds are speculative grade because their ratings have dropped below triple-B -- a total of between ¥10 trillion and ¥15 trillion ($75 billion and $125 billion).

Table: Ripe for Junk Bonds



Barron's has learned that a group of executives who run a small investment-management company in Tokyo with a window on Wall Street has informally approached Milken, asking for his advice and support in pioneering a market to pump desperately needed capital into companies with low credit ratings.

"In Japan's depressed business environment, it is increasingly hard for companies to get money from banks, which are struggling with their own bad-loan problems," says Minoru Yoshida, president of Axes (Japan) Securities Co. "Japan needs a viable alternative to bank financing, and who better to educate us about junk bonds than Michael Milken?"

"Japan desperately needs a high-yield-bond market, and the timing for such a market seems good," adds Glenn Yago, author of "Junk Bonds: How High-Yield Securities Restructured Corporate America" and director of capital studies for the eponymous Milken Institute. "The parallels of illiquidity and stagnation related to the onset of the U.S. high-yield market are striking."

Milken, who until this year hadn't visited Japan in 16 years, raised the issue of a junk-bond market in October at a Tokyo seminar for Axes. "There is a tremendous opportunity in Japan to increase substantially the rate of return on investment, both for financial institutions and individuals," he said. "One way to do this is through the creation of a high-yield-bond market."

In previous meetings with Axes executives, Yoshida says, Milken has expressed "great enthusiasm and support" for the firm's idea of pioneering a junk-bond market in Japan. He says Axes hopes to organize a consortium of domestic and foreign investors to help finance the start-up of a high-yield-bond market that would include public institutions like the Japan Development Bank, which is currently considering buying junk bonds, and Japan's state-run loan collector, the Resolution and Collection Corp., which currently purchases dud loans from banks and collects repayment or collateral. Insurance companies, asset managers, investment trusts and other institutional investors, domestic and foreign, also are being approached for seed money for the proposed market, Yoshida says.

But nothing formal has been agreed upon, he emphasizes, and Milken's involvement may be limited to informal advice or access to his research network and investment contacts. "Milken is very rich and doesn't need the money, and, of course is very devoted to the idea," says Yoshida. "But he is a bit nervous about being involved, even in a tangential way, in anything related to the securities business."

That's because under the terms of Milken's probation -- he served less than two years of a 10-year prison sentence -- the ex-junk-bond king is barred indefinitely from "association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, investment company or municipal-securities dealer." (Milken nonetheless was linked to deals in the 1990s involving some prominent former Drexel clients, including Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch and Ron Perelman.) Whether that ban applies to overseas relationship is unclear. Axes also has a Stamford, Conn., subsidiary, Axes America LLC, which its Website describes as "providing investment information and products to Axes (Japan) and liaison with offshore funds."

Asked whether Milken's involvement in establishing a Japanese junk-bond market would be legal, a spokesman insisted "whether it would be or not, Mike has no intention of returning to that business." While confirming Milken did meet with Axes executives at their Tokyo seminar and perhaps on other occasions, the spokesman doubted specific business proposals were discussed.

Though most Japanese financial executives are familiar with Milken's past transgressions, they believe his expertise and knowledge would overcome any stigma. "We could use 10 Mike Milkens," quips Deutsche's Shima.

Still, he and other credit experts believe that it may take more than Milken's charisma -- or connections -- to get the idea of a junk-bond market off the ground, especially in a country where most investors prefer the safety of low-interest government bonds and bank deposits.

"Japanese investors are inherently pretty conservative, and it has only been in the last few years that they amended the law to permit a company rated less than single-A to issue a bond," notes Martin Fridson, former head of Merrill Lynch's high-yield research. "And I'm not sure how effective Mike Milken would be as an evangelist for a junk-bond market, unless he has toned down his message from the old days when he peddled junk bonds with missionary zeal. That would be a real turn-off for Japanese investors."

Banks would also have to stop making cheap loans to low-rated companies; most such loans are made by banks to members of their "keiretsu," or corporate groups, and receive favorable consideration. "It is difficult to compete with banks, when the spreads between a bank loan and a corporate bond are [five-to-six percentage] points," says Axes's Yoshida. "And as long as companies can get cheap money to sustain their operations, there is no reason for them to restructure."

Deutsche's Shima adds there is a cultural barrier to the development of a junk-bond market. "The ministry of finance has been giving negative guidance to institutional investors for years, telling them that low-rated corporate bonds are bad and should not exist," he explains. "And that would have to stop."

Nevertheless, as others point out, it is also an idea whose time may have come, with Japan's financial crisis showing no signs of abating.

"Japan faces a massive financial restructuring problem on the bank and corporate side," says Yago of the Milken Institute. "I don't see any other way out of the box other than to try to bring in investors at higher offering rates and allowing them to work out the country's existing debt problems," he adds. "Every year they delay just keeps them deeper in the box."

"There are many good companies eager to restructure their business but they need money," says Yoshida of Axes. "We are trying to persuade them to issue corporate bonds." To make the concept of junk bonds more compatible, Yoshida suggests using an alternative name like "Opportunity Bonds" or "Phoenix Bonds."

That's a monicker that an erstwhile Master of the Universe turned philanthropist, educator and entrepreneur like Mike Milken, with his Teflon-like resistance and ability to resurrect, reinvent and rehabilitate himself these past 10 years, would no doubt approve of.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E-mail comments to editors@barrons.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10454)12/14/2002 1:56:06 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
The Ball's in the SEC's Court Now

By HOWARD R. GOLD
Barron's
December 12th, 2002

We haven't heard much about corporate malfeasance of late. Amid the gathering storm of a potential war with Iraq, the "crisis of confidence" in corporate America, a white-hot issue this spring and summer, seems to be in a deep freeze right now.

Why? Well, no new major scandals have come to light recently. At least two of the biggest fish from the Mothers of All Scandals-former chief financial officers Scott Sullivan of WorldCom and Andrew Fastow of Enron-have been indicted. And the Republican triumph in the midterm elections was a clear sign that voters have a short attention span, or that this issue just doesn't have legs.

Or maybe there's another explanation: The crisis is basically over.

Not that all the problems have been solved. Far from it. But President Bush's signing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in late July and the adoption by the New York Stock Exchange of its new corporate-governance rules probably signal the end of the period of outrage and reform. (Reforms on Wall Street are another story, however.)

Just to recap, Sarbanes-Oxley requires, among other things, that CEOs and CFOs regularly certify the accuracy of companies' financial reports and that corporate disclosures, including of insider trades, be greatly accelerated. It bans personal loans to executives and mandates that audit committees and outside auditors be independent of corporate management. The law also assesses heavy civil and criminal penalties for violators.

The NYSE now requires that independent directors comprise a majority of the boards of its roughly 2,800 listed companies and that key board committees like audit and compensation be composed entirely of independent directors. Under the new rules, shareholders also must be allowed to vote on stock-option plans. (Nasdaq is adopting similar rules and other proposals of its own for the 3,800 companies that trade there.)

These new rules will, I believe, close most of the major loopholes so many corporate sleazebags drove trucks through during the 1990s. Along with the original securities acts of the 1930s, they provide a strong foundation for rebuilding investors' faith in U.S. capital markets.

"You have a good framework. Now the question is, how will it be implemented?" says Nancy Smith, a former Securities and Exchange Commission official who's now director of a new Washington, D.C.-based corporate-reform group, RestoreTheTrust.com.

And there's the rub: It's up to the SEC to make the changes stick.

The SEC must follow the roadmap Sarbanes-Oxley drew. The law sets all kinds of deadlines for implementation, but leaves it up to the Commission to figure out how. It's a heavy burden for an already shaky federal agency.

For years, the SEC has been understaffed, underfunded and overwhelmed, paying uncompetitive salaries and far too often overmatched by the armies of highly compensated attorneys and auditors that companies typically throw into their battles with regulators. Congress, under pressure from powerful lobbyists, repeatedly undermined the efforts of SEC chairmen by threatening to cut funding altogether.

And then there was Harvey. You all know the story, so I won't dwell on it, but chairman Pitt's tin ear and ham-fisted manner was a disaster. His effort to ram through the appointment of ex-FBI director William Webster as head of the new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board backfired amid allegations Pitt covered up Webster's role on the audit committee of a failed dot.com, US Technologies. Ultimately Pitt, Webster and the SEC's chief accountant all resigned.

That's why there may be as many delays in implementing Sarbanes-Oxley as there were installing those new baggage-screening devices in airports.

"It's going to be tough to meet those deadlines with the state the Commission is in. It's a fairly demoralized agency at this point," says Alan Bromberg, a professor at the Dedman School of Law at Southern Methodist University.

That's why President Bush's appointment of William Donaldson as SEC chairman is key.

Donaldson's resume puts him in the fine tradition of other Bush corporate-suit appointees, and he hasn't exactly spent his career rattling cages. He also may not have the kind of dynamism that would rouse the SEC's staffers out of their current funk.

But he does have some things going for him: He knows the markets well, he's an experienced manager and as an authentic longtime FOBF (Friend of the Bush Family) he apparently has the president's trust.

More importantly, he appears to have the president's commitment to double the SEC's $438-million budget by fiscal 2004.

He also has his work cut out for him.

"Sarbanes-Oxley instructed the SEC to do a lot of work. One of the things Mr. Donaldson has to do is to step in quickly and make sure the work gets done," says Donald Langevoort, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center who once worked as an SEC attorney.

Once confirmed, Donaldson faces some crucial early tests.

Number one is the selection of the new chairman of the oversight board, who must be experienced and independent of the accounting profession if he or she is going to do what the law intended-restore investors' trust in auditors.

Sarah Teslick, executive director of the Council of Institutional Investors, is watching to see whether the five SEC commissioners (including the chairman) can agree unanimously on a new oversight chairman. Webster won a rancorous three-to-two vote, with the two Democratic commissioners, Harvey Goldschmid and Roel Campos, strongly opposed.

"If there's another split vote on party lines over the chairman, then that's a bad sign," she says.

As for Donaldson, the larger question is, as Nancy Smith puts it, "Will he switch his loyalties from Wall Street to putting investors first?"

The answer to that will determine whether he goes down in history as a successful SEC chairman-and whether the new law ushers in a period of real change or just more empty promises.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Howard R. Gold is editor of Barron's Online. Fighting the Tape appears twice monthly.