SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (61705)12/14/2002 11:50:16 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Buchanans new mag is getting a lot of ink. Here is his lead article about the flap he caused with Canada.

Come Home, America

by Pat Buchanan

During what we call the "C" segment on our MSNBC daily show, Bill Press and I were debating Canada's decision to issue a travel warning to all Canadians thinking of visiting the United States.

Seems a Syrian-born Canadian citizen, flying home via JFK, was interrogated by U.S. officials, finger-printed, photographed, and sent back to Damascus. This was in line with a new U.S. policy that singles out travelers from five nations, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Iran, Iraq, that have a history of harboring terrorists.

Press took Canada's side, accusing the Bushites of ethnic profiling. I replied that the insult came from a country that freeloads off U.S. defense and is itself a haven for terrorists. Final bon mot: We Americans don't "need lectures from Soviet Canuckistan."

That set the cat down among the pigeons. Before the show ended, correspondents for Canadian press and TV were in the lobby. Some of my interviewers agreed with me. Others bristled with controlled rage. Yet, the Canuckistan crack aside, is it not time our whining and carping allies heard what some of us think of them?

Was I wrong about Canada? Here is Diane Francis, columnist for the National Post: "Canada's immigration, refugee and legal system facilitates the entry into the continent of ... terrorists." Here is U.S. anti-terrorism expert Buck Revell: "Unless and until Canada can tighten its controls on immigration and refugees, these controls will have to be imposed at the [U.S.] border..."

As for Canada's military, The American Enterprise, the magazine of AEI, writes: "Canadian military spending stands at $265 per capita. the worst among the NATO members." Her defense effort is not half the NATO average and but a fourth of the U.S. effort. Canada is exactly what I said it was: a free rider on the U.S. defense budget.

With only 34 ships in a navy that boasted 300 in World War II (only 12 are up to U.S. standards), Canada has ?stopped air and sea patrols around its coastline, the world?s longest ... . Smugglers already run rampant, and terrorists can?t be stopped,? writes TAE.

?We have sovereignty over the Arctic areas only by the grace of other nations,? says Canadian defense critic Rob Anders.

And though we let Canada devalue its dollar and run up $50 billion trade surpluses at the expense of our timber men and farmers, we still hear the endless belly-aching from up north.

TAE?s December issue debates a parallel deepening divide between the U.S. and Europe. Writes editor Karl Zinsmeister: ?The simple reality needs to be faced squarely by Americans: In a great variety of ways ? Americans and Europeans are growing apart.?

The three ?critical structural breaks? in Zinsmeister?s view: The U.S. is dynamic, Europe is dying, and Europeans have lost the stomach for military action. When FDR called welfare a ?narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit,? it applied to nations as well as men. Ike was right: We should have pulled our troops out in 1961. Europe might today be standing on her own feet with her own robust continental defense, not mooching off America and behaving with the sneering resentment of a 40-year-old still living under his old man?s roof.

While the writers in Zinsmeister?s symposium are, almost all of them, neoconservatives, they sound like Sam Francis and Charley Reese.

?Old and in the Way? is Zinsmeister?s own title. ?Irrational Anti-Americanism Takes Root Across the Atlantic,? ?Goodbye Europe,? ?A One-Sided Alliance,? ?Irritating and Irrelevant,? ?The Real Problem is European Elites,? are the titles of the other essays. Only pro-American Brit John O?Sullivan offers relief from the remorseless Euro-bashing.

Yet, when one reads on the eve of an Armistice Day that recalls the Doughboys who died rescuing Europe in World War I, that 500,000 marched through Florence in a parade that featured ?communist hymns, red flags and portraits of Ernesto ?Che? Guevara,? perhaps we can now all agree: It is time we came home.

Whatever one may think of war with Iraq, George Bush is not Hitler, and America is not the Third Reich. We don?t need this. We don?t need these people. Now that the Cold War is over, let us graciously cede NATO to the Europeans, bring our boys home, let Europeans provide for their own defense, and go our separate way in the world. If they don?t like us, fine. Our forefathers didn?t much like them either.

Rising anti-Americanism in Canada and Europe testifies anew to the wisdom of our founding fathers. ?It is our true policy to steer clear of any permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world,? said George Washington. Echoed Jefferson: Our policy should be ?peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.?

Amen. Even the neocons seem to be getting the message.
amconmag.com



To: JohnM who wrote (61705)12/14/2002 3:26:23 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Todays News: FBI Director Says Close to 100 Terror Attacks Thwarted Since Sept. 11, 2001

Dec 14, 2002
By Curt Anderson
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Nearly 100 terrorist attacks, some intended to take place on U.S. soil, have been thwarted since Sept. 11, 2001, FBI Director Robert Mueller says. But he warns that many potential terrorists remain at large in the United States.
"We will be at war until we make certain that every member of al-Qaida is incapacitated in his or her ability to harm the United States," Mueller told The Associated Press.

In a wide-ranging, almost hourlong interview in his seventh-floor conference room at FBI headquarters, Mueller also rejected proposals to shift counterintelligence duties from the FBI to a new agency. He said punishment is not the answer for mistakes by individual FBI agents before the Sept. 11 attacks.

On terrorism, Mueller said "tens of attacks, probably close to a hundred around the world" have been stopped in the past 15 months. He credited better intelligence gathering and coordination, and information from al-Qaida detainees in custody, including those he described as architects of would-be attacks.

"There have been any number of attacks on ships that have been thwarted," Mueller said. "Without getting into details, we have thwarted a number of attacks, both large and small."

Asked if some of those attacks were aimed at U.S. targets, Mueller said: "Yes."

He specifically mentioned Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen being held as an enemy combatant who authorities say was plotting to detonate a "dirty" radioactive bomb in the United States. Also cited were the arrests of members of an alleged al-Qaida cell in Lackawanna, N.Y., and individuals in Portland, Ore., Seattle and elsewhere.

Mueller said it may take years to destroy al-Qaida and other terrorist groups, but he said the United States and its allies have the upper hand.

"I think we're well on our way to winning the war, but the fact of the matter is, it is a war. Al-Qaida still has the capability of striking us," he said.

The bureau, he said, is on the lookout for unconventional attacks, noting the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers used only boxcutters for weapons. "No explosives, no guns. Terrorists can operate in a number of ways. We need to continue to be alert, be vigilant," he said.

The FBI believes there are several hundred people in the United States who are either potential terrorists, part of their financial or other support network, or who authorities simply need to rule out as suspects.

These people are being tracked down by teams such as the new Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force, a part of the FBI's broader transformation from an agency focused mainly on law enforcement to one whose priority is preventing terrorism, Mueller said.

That has included much improved technology, the reassignment of more than 500 agents to fight terrorism and the hiring of more than 330 linguists to translate such languages as Arabic and Pashtun.

There have been deadly bombings recently in Indonesia and Kenya, and renewed threats against the United States in an audiotape attributed to Osama bin Laden. Mueller, however, said he saw no specific, credible intelligence heading into the holiday season that should lead the Bush administration to raise the nation's terror alert from "elevated" status.

"That level is where it needs to be," Mueller said.

The FBI has come under repeated criticism for failing to stop the Sept. 11 attacks and ignoring warning signs. Mueller said the bureau is a much different place now, with far better information-gathering technology and improved communication. But, he added, "We still have a ways to go."

One major change has been better teamwork with the CIA, Defense Department and state and local law enforcement agencies, said Mueller, who took over the FBI only a week before the attacks. There are 25 CIA analysts working at the FBI to analyze intelligence and joint CIA-FBI teams working in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere to root out terrorists.

A decade ago, when Mueller headed the Justice Department's criminal division, he said CIA station chiefs and the FBI "didn't talk to each other. Right now, the exchange of information is truly remarkable."

Yet he acknowledged it is a daunting task to analyze a veritable "river" of intelligence that flows into the U.S. government for that one piece of information that could deter a terrorist attack.

"We need to integrate our human resources, our technical resources to do a better job of putting those pieces together," Mueller said.

Still, Mueller opposed a joint House-Senate intelligence committee's recommendation that Congress and the administration consider creating a domestic intelligence agency to focus entirely on preventing a recurrence of the terror attacks.

The FBI, he said, is "uniquely positioned" to tackle the job because it has intelligence and law-enforcement capabilities - allowing it to both detect and, if necessary, arrest or seek deportation of would-be terrorists before they strike.

"There has to be a mechanism for deterring those individuals," Mueller said. "We have the same people who have knowledge of intelligence and knowledge of criminal activity being undertaken by these individuals."

Mueller also said he did not share the enthusiasm of some on Capitol Hill to punish FBI agents or others who may have made mistakes prior to Sept. 11.

"One cannot look at holding people accountable as a solution to these problems," he said, adding that part of the pre-Sept. 11 problems involved a lack of resources. Mueller said that if the FBI's independent internal watchdog identified conduct worthy of punishment, it would be meted out to agents.

Of greater importance, Mueller said, is ensuring that the FBI and the government as a whole have the resources, training and focus needed to keep up the anti-terrorism battle.

Mueller also discussed the investigation into last year's anthrax attacks, saying he gets a report on it at least once a week. "I see progress in the investigation. Sometimes it's smaller than others, but progress," he said.

AP-ES-12-14-02 1314EST

This story can be found at: ap.tbo.com