Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (150829)	12/14/2002 7:11:08 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>>If the inspectors find nothing (and that is a possibility), then we might have to make up things as a pretext for war. So now Bush and Rumsfeld have been lying!

To: GST who wrote (150829)	12/14/2002 9:22:39 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

I think the region needs to be de-stablilized, such that if we can get democracy in Iraq, perhaps, like dominoes, the others (hopefully saudi arabia, etc) will follow. As far as nuclear capability, well, if you can see this point, then why wouldn't you be in agreement that invasion is necessary, and as such, why should we give a flying fig about what France or others might think? I was reading a periodical today which spoke about the situation when Israel was created in 1948. I'm sure you know there was an Israeli-Arab war in '48 which, did not, but could have led to the immediate destruction of the State of Israel. The article continued to assert that had this occurred, there was no way a "palestinian" state would have been created, rather, the territory would have been carved up by Jordan, Egypt, etc.