Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (26158)	12/16/2002 11:24:16 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Kyros, the New Zealand SIS had to let me go because they went over to Iraq to help Blix go looking for nukes, smallpox and napalm or something. They must have decided my weapons of mass destruction were unimpressive, [though I consider that an insult to my terrorist skills], and have gone hunting big game. I think they would find much bigger weapons of mass destruction in the USA, where they would hit the jackpot! But apparently it's okay for the USA to fry Japanese children, women and men by the 100,000 or million with nukes and stuff. Saddam isn't allowed more than a few hand grenades. France, a proven terrorist state [the only one to have attacked NZ], is also a possessor of weapons of mass destruction and a search and destroy mission should be established there by the UN. I think our Prime Minister, Helen Clark, fancies herself as the next Secretary General of the United Nations and is positioning herself and New Zealand as supporters of the UN. Which is okay by me. So there are a bunch of inspectors from the SIS now in Iraq. I have some sympathy with the idea that UN inspectors are really just USA spies, because the SIS and New Zealand are quite good buddies of King George II, Colin Powell and co. What's needed is that We the Sheople revamp the UN into something more representative of how We the Sheople want the world to be run. The USA is in favour of democracy, so I'm sure they'll be keen on it. Hahaahaha!! I'm kidding. The USA does NOT believe in democracy and freedom. Americans don't understand that but most people around the world notice that an American Empire is under construction. That's just what happens when a political and economic entity has got the bit between its teeth. But I guess the USA would be in favour of a revamped UN with a constitution which doesn't bludge on the productive capacity of the USA. It's important to have a democratic process which doesn't enable people to vote to take other people's money. The UN would therefore have to have very circumscribed powers to do with borders, security and the commons, such as the air, oceans, spectrum and space, NOT redistribution of wealth as desired by the envious, avaricious, non-productive, lazy, stupid and ignorant as happens in all to many democracies. Mqurice