Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (61964)	12/16/2002 1:44:08 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

If the people on the spot were drifting toward the Arab side, don’t you think it might have been because direct observation of the problems as they stood suggested that the Arabs had legitimate grievances? Or that the Arabs were more likely to create mayhem, and thus needed appeasing more. Practically speaking, it was much easier to stop Jewish immigration than Arab immigration, so that's what they did. During the 20s and 30s the British didn't even try to count Arab immigration.