SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10534)12/16/2002 2:40:58 PM
From: interesting man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
WHT is an unhedged silver and gold play. It just got listed on the AMEX. Worth a shot at 86 cents. no debt and has a little cash to play with.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10534)12/16/2002 3:17:18 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
ANALYSIS - Dollar at risk as global investors quietly exit US

Monday December 16, 1:48 am ET

By Yoshiko Mori

TOKYO, Dec 16 (Reuters) - The Japanese government has long been the world's largest and most loyal holder of U.S. Treasuries, but Japanese private-sector investors are no longer committed buyers of U.S. bonds, regarding the returns as too low for what they see as the risks inherent in U.S. markets.

This illustrates a potential threat to both the dollar and the smooth financing of U.S. debt, as not only Japanese but also Europeans are quietly pulling out of U.S. markets.

On Friday, the euro rose to $1.0260, its highest rate against the dollar in nearly three years, as increasing concern about geopolitical risk associated with Iraq and North Korea undermined the greenback.

But analysts say the dollar's appeal to global investors was dimming well before the geopolitical risk set in.

"The United States has successfully lured global capital into its financial markets for the past seven years on the back of the strong dollar policy and the stock market boom," said Kazuo Mizuno, chief economist at Mitsubishi Securities.

"But it's getting harder and harder for them to ensure external financing, as potential returns on investment (in the U.S.) become too marginal in the eyes of foreign investors."

Given the weak state of global equity markets, a country seeking foreign capital needs to keep reducing interest rates to maintain stable foreign capital inflows by increasing chances of capital gains on bonds, he said.

"Unfortunately, there is not much ammunition left for them (the U.S.)," he said. The trend-setting U.S. federal funds rate is now at a four-decade low of 1.25 percent.

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE

European rates have a comparative advantage over the United States even after the European Central Bank (ECB) lowered its benchmark rate recently by half a percentage point to 2.75 percent. The ECB has more scope than the U.S. Federal Reserve to cut its rates further.

Apparently sensing the danger of more capital flowing out of U.S. markets, Fred Bergsten, head of the Institute for International Economics, a Washington think-tank, told CNN earlier this month that there is now a huge differential between European rates over U.S. rates and that the ECB has got to move interest rates down.

The benchmark 10-year German bond yield was at 4.321 percent on Friday, compared to the 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield of 4.050 percent on Monday.

Japanese investors, who in the past have been active buyers of U.S. bonds, may now find they have more of them than they would wish, with interest rates too low and buffers against risk too small.

Chances that the administration of President George W. Bush could start to sound a more exporter- friendly line emerged after Bush's sudden move to appoint a new economic team last week.

"It's basically a no-way-out situation. If they advertise a weak dollar policy they will alienate foreign investors more. And if they keep the 'strong dollar' propaganda up, they will choke U.S. exporters," said a senior Japanese bank trader.

The only viable foreign exchange policy for the United States would seem to be to say nothing, he said.

The U.S. Treasury Department said it had "no comment" and "nothing new" to say on dollar policy on Monday of last week, the day when Bush announced he was replacing his Treasury secretary.

"I observe that the United States is entering into a risky game of tacitly accepting a gradual dollar fall initiated by the market," said Masaaki Kanno, managing director of economic research at J.P. Morgan Securities Asia.

Though this policy may not involve any imminent danger, it could lead to a sharp and sizable fall in the dollar when the U.S. current account deficit and budget deficit grow significantly larger.

DOLLAR OVERHANG

But investors may be sensing the danger already.

According to data from Japan's Ministry of Finance, Japanese investors bought a net 1.09 trillion yen ($9.04 billion) worth of foreign bonds and stocks in October.

Of the total, 717.7 billion yen or 66 percent was spent on investment in the European Union, and only 107.8 billion yen or 9.8 percent was spent on U.S. bonds and stocks.

"Japanese institutions were aggressive buyers U.S. bonds from the middle of this year, but by October they must have found they had an excess of them, and thus funds shifted elsewhere," said a Finance Ministry official.

The high ratio of European securities purchases by Japanese in October, at 66 percent, compared to an average of only 28 percent in the five months to September. Going back further, Japanese dumped 3.16 trillion yen worth of European securities in January-April.

Among the large Japanese investors in foreign assets, the nation's third-largest insurer, Sumitomo Life Insurance Co Ltd, boosted its euro-denominated assets to 188.59 billion yen by the end of September from 3.52 billion yen at the end of March 2001.

"We have increased our euro bond holdings as we see more opportunities for capital gains there," said Mitsutoshi Mise, general manager of the finance and investment planning department at Sumitomo Life.

Meanwhile, Japan's publicly offered investment trusts increased their holdings of bonds and stocks from euro zone issuers to 1.45 trillion yen by the end of October, against 875.7 billion yen a year earlier.

EUROPEANS ALSO SHIFT AWAY FROM U.S. MARKETS

As Japanese investors increasingly favoured European assets, European investors withdrew some money from American markets.

U.S. Treasury data shows net purchases of U.S. long-term securities, including Treasuries, agency bonds, corporate bonds and stocks, by Europeans excluding British investors nosedived to $18.49 billion in January-September compared with $78.92 billion for the whole of 2001.

ECB data shows that the euro zone had foreign capital inflows of 25.1 billion euros in January- September, reversing an outflow of 85.2 billion euros in the same period last year.

"The euro is slowly but steadily eroding the key currency status of the dollar as more investors favour the single currency," Mizuno said.

biz.yahoo.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10534)12/16/2002 3:22:02 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Ken Lay -- Mr. Corporate Irresponsibility <G>...

High-fliers : The Enron jet set
By Robert Bryce
Monday November 4, 2002
The Guardian
guardian.co.uk

Robin Lay wanted to come home.

The sand, the sun and the beautiful people were fun, but Robin,
Linda Lay's daughter from her previous marriage, had been in the
south of France long enough. It was time to go back to Houston
and be with her mom and dad. So in mid-1999, Ken or Linda Lay
made a few phone calls, and a few hours later, an Enron Falcon
900 jet was dispatched - empty, except for the pilots - to fetch
her from Nice.

Never mind the cost. Never mind the squadrons of commercial
airliners that fly from France to Houston every day of the week.
Never mind that Robin was an adult in her early 30s who should
have been able to fend for herself. At Enron, what mattered to
the Lays, was what mattered.

The Falcon 900 is a lovely aeroplane. Capable of cruising at
560mph, its wide leather chairs and suave couch make
first-class seats on a commercial jetliner look shabby. In the
universe of private jets, it's hard to beat the Falcon. But all that
luxury comes with a hefty price tag. Enron's internal billing
system estimated the cost of flying the Falcon 900 (a new one
costs about $30m) at $5,200 per hour. Which means that Robin
Lay's excursion from the Côte d'Azur to the Côte de Smog cost
Enron $125,000.

No other part of Enron's business better reflected the company's
out-of-control egos and out-of-control spending than the aviation
department. While other parts of the company were burning
through cash at record rates, Enron executives were cruising five
miles high in ultra-luxe style. By spring 2001, Enron had six jets
in its fleet. There were two Falcon 900s, three Hawker 800s and
a Falcon 50.

Enron did need access to private jets, but it was also obvious
that during the Skilling era, the company's hangars and planes
became a high-altitude playground for the company's Big Shots.

Car races in Canada, shopping in New York, vacations in Cabo
San Lucas (an upscale Mexican resort on the tip of Baja
California), a "business" trip to London - all were taken on Enron
jets, at Enron expense, by Enron's most senior executives, and
not a thought was ever given to how much all of it was really
costing.

"The biggest abuser of the planes was Ken Lay and his family,"
said one longtime Enron pilot, who lost over $2m in retirement
and deferred compensation after the company's bankruptcy.
Whether the destination was the Lays' chalet in Aspen or a
quick trip to Cabo San Lucas, Ken and Linda Lay always flew in
the newest Falcon 900 in the Enron fleet.

Sometimes, the Lays needed two jets: a His and a Hers.
"Several times, Mr Lay was going to New York, but Mrs Lay
could not leave at the same time. She'd have something to do,
so she'd have to leave an hour or two later. So we'd fly him to
New York and then follow that plane with another one. Then, the
aeroplanes would have to deadhead [return empty] back to
Houston. It was extravagant. It was a waste of money. It'd
happen eight or more times a year," says one member of the
aviation team.

The Lay family was constantly finding new and inventive ways of
using the planes as their personal pickup truck. When Robin
Lay moved to France, Ken and Linda wanted to visit. And since
there seemed to be plenty of room in the Falcon 900, they
decided to take Robin's bed with them. "We were supposed to
take a king-size bed, but we couldn't get the box spring through
the door. I said, 'Unless you want me to cut it in half, it's not
going.' So we left it in the hangar. We ended up taking the
mattress and the headboard and the side rails," said one pilot
who made the trip. A few months later, when Robin moved back
to the US, the Enron planes were used to carry her furniture,
including the bed, back to Houston.

In 2000 alone, Ken Lay's personal plane use was estimated at
$334,179.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10534)12/16/2002 3:28:44 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Strong-dollar policy put to the test

U.S. greenback down 11% globally

By Jacqueline Thorpe
Financial Post
Monday, December 16, 2002

nationalpost.com{1E908DC8-8AB4-49DE-9196-A81EE7D6A4C9}



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (10534)12/16/2002 4:05:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Will the dollar fall further in 2003?

[posted on the Financial Times Website -- Discussion Group Area]

by Robert Kingston Guest #1000022 of 25
15 Dec 2002 11:21 AM (in London)

What will happen to the Dollar in 2003

Here is a view from Down Under.

The US trade deficit will weigh heavily on the US Dollar and the US Dollar will continue its structural adjustment downwards relative to the rest of the world.

The strong foundations on which the US domestic economy is built remain despite an unheathy dependence on imported oil and are going to be able to finance the economic wellbeing of the American people. However it is unlikely that the US economy is going to be able to continue supporting worldwide economic growth to the extent that it has during the last decade and this will effect the dollar.

The world needs China to agree to allow the revaluation of the Yuan which it is unlikely to agree to meanwhile Japan insists on trying to competitively devalue the Yen against a US dollar being rerated in Trade Weighted terms by Global Financial Markets. The pound will be increasing exposed as the dollar declines and will also decline.

The eventual losers are going to be Japanese savers/taxpayers/investors.

Europe is watching from the sidelines.

In Trade Weighted terms currency movements in 2003 will be as follows:

Euro - Stable
GBP - Down
US$ - Down
Yen - Up
Yuan - Up
A$ - Stable

My thinking is as follows:

The fizz in the US economy was supported by the US maintaining sound public finances whilst leading us all into the IT revolution (both the development and application of the technology), share price performance underpinned by once off productivity increases made possible by that IT revolution, financial engineering (gearing), management motivation (corporate sector wide adoption of performance based remuneration), unsound (not expensing options) and creative (hidden gearing) accounting and even outright frauds perpetrated on naive and willing victims from all over the world who uncritically swallowed the US business model triumphalism and new economy hubris.

US public finances have deteriorated dramatically due to fiscal boost of President Bushes tax cuts and the economic slowdown.

The IT revolution (or PC and networking part of it anyway) has taken the long march to China and is now a commodity product. Software development is going back to the internet "garage". Thousands of volunteers develop ever more robust open source software for the challenge of it and the pleasure of sticking it to the millionaires at Microsoft.

Once off productivity gains have been had as has the general public. These "productivity gains" (automated telephone systems for example) have often been at the consumers expense (uncosted manhours waiting through tedious telephone menus, do it yourself airline reservations etc), result net transfer of economic resource from the many (our time) to the few (the entities with whom we are obliged to deal), far less net economic gain than corporate performance might suggest. In many cases just a transfer from the now even more time poor consumers to producers.

Corporate equity was converted to debt to such an extent that what remained became dangerously overexposed to risk and lost value as a result. Consequence, previously bankable companies found themselves locked out of commercial debt markets and investors declined to take up the slack having lost their appetites for punting once the dot.com bubble burst.

"Enlightened" US management motivation led to senior management resembling an Xstreme sport the object of which was to keep the market and auditors fooled or compromised long enough to allow those deeply in the money options to mature and be eased into the market while staying in the job and out of jail. The next generation of senior management are going to have to dedicate themselves to establishing their credibility through the restoration of US corporate balance sheets. Result, less of tomorrows already reduced earnings are going to be be paid out to shareholders.

US accounting practices will become more principle based resulting in a long term lowering of profitability of US corporates as they expense options, fund pension commitments and phase out other "legally compliant" accounting tricks. Result even more of corporate earnings directed to paying for past sins. Accountants are not going to be highlighting their creativity on their CV's for some time.

In their enthusiasm to find scapegoats for their greed and stupidity the small investor will oblige politicians to impose counter productive regulations on the capital markets whilst simultaneously capitulating at the bottom of the market and crystallising stock losses where they will most impact consumer spending power and confidence. On the other hand the pro's, having already parked their "conservative" capital with the US government to fund the coming deficit and fully hedged their foreign exchange position, will allocate their "risk" capital to calling the bottom of the market and then just sit and wait for a generation. Excess capacity will ensure that any eventual recovery is some time off and fresh savings increasing go elsewhere (or foreign don't come to the US) looking for greener fields (emerging markets??).

Now if we were just talking about one of those smaller economies that periodically gets swamped by capital flows set off when someone in Washington or Wall Street has a bad hair day this wouldn't be a problem.

Someone would pontificate on the unsustainability of it all. The country concerned would haemorrage capital, politicians would fall, the social order would be challenged and most importantly the currency would collapse along with the economy.

Washington based economists from the IMF would no doubt provide an explanation as to how it all came about, who was to blame and what should now be done and life would go on.

However in this case we are talking about the worlds largest economy that has managed to convince not only its own citizens but also a large percentage of the world's population that its currency is a bankable asset into which they can safely invest their savings.

Clearly being the seabed to which everyone else is anchored can give the impression that all other currencies float relative to the mighty US dollar.

However, imperceptible as it may be continents shift and those floating on the ocean above merely adjust their moorings to maintain their position.

In other words the value of currencies is relative with respect to each other and the US dollar despite its size and importance is no different from any other in this respect. That free and unfettered movement of capital so beloved of advocates of unbridled international capital markets that can and often does overwhelm the smaller economies will eventually have its effect on the mighty US dollar.

Now those of you that were around in the 70's or have read a little about the OPEC inspired increase in the oil price may recall that the last time that a major bite was taken out of the US consumers pocket other than by Uncle Sam it was quickly recycled via Wall Street into developing world sovereign debt. By the time a large part of this debt was shown to be worthless in the 80's it had been sold off to institutional investors and the investing public wore the loss. The ever grateful oil producers continue to this day to hold their capital in US dollars.

Meanwhile over in Japan they had found that it was merely necessary to encourage their financial institutions to park the Japanese people's vast savings in US dollar assets to ensure that Japan could embark on seemingly never ending economic growth based on exporting from their relatively "cheap" industrialised economy to the huge US "expensive" one. The good old US consumer having paid a kings ransom to keep consuming oil along with all the other necessities of the American way of life then found themselves borrowing Japan's retirement savings to finance their continuing urge to splurge.

As the US dollar maintained its relatively high value to the rest of the world vast swathes of US industry found itself put out of business by the lower cost rest of the world.

A self perpetuating cycle developed whereby not only rational risk calculating international investors but also nationals of virtually every nation on earth financed the increasingly voracious appetite of the US for capital to fund its import bill with their flight capital and pension funds. Anyone familiar with pyramid selling structures will recognise this for what it was. A self perpetuating bubble that the longer it went on the greater the mess when it finally burst..

Now this shift in the global economic order was not a solely US affair and it affected other smaller economies like Australia in a similar manner. However throughout this process the US consumer took centre stage and the US dollar reigned supreme.

The process has undoubtedly had many beneficial consequences. The most important of which has been the gradual shift of the world's productive capacity and capital from the few developed to the many developing economies.

The widespread adoption of "economic rationalism" and US style capitalism can claim credit for the greatest reduction of poverty the world has ever known and the onward march of globalisation despite the occasional cultural clash is probably both inevitable and beneficial.

However the US consumer cannot continue consuming and underwriting through that consumption the financing of global economic activity indefinitely.

Now Australia is a trading nation with roughly a third of our exports going to North America, Europe and Asia respectively. However we are aware that a significant part of what goes to Asia eventually finds its way to the US incorporated into the exports of our Asian customers.

If the US consumer is no longer going to keep absorbing our exports who the hell is.

Good old Europe. Well no. The best we can hope for from them is that they maintain their economies on an even keel and things carry on with modest growth much has they have done for years. Unless, that is, they do something about EU support for agricultural producers with whose subsidised surpluses we and many developing economies then have to compete with on the international market.

While we wish them well on the great European project and trust that in time they find a way to open their market to the world's agricultural exports without destroying the culture and tradition bound up in the countryside we Australians so love to visit as tourists its unlikely that its going to happen in the short term. Nor are they likely to reform their expensive welfare states to the extent required to permit the EU consumer to finance an extended consumption binge of sufficient magnitude to fill the void left by the spent US consumer.

What about Japan the world's second largest economy and our biggest customer?

Oh dear. What a mess.

It is little more than a decade since Japan was being hailed as possessing almost devine insight into matters of political economy and industrial organisation. The decline of a country with everything going for it economically to one having the largest government debt in the world has been breathtaking and is perhaps still not fully appreciated by the world at large.

Only this week we have had the continuing spectacle of Japanese politicians trying to talk down the Yen in an attempt to maintain their ability to compete with China and maintain their vast trade surplus with the US. Its as if the only game they know is the mercantilist one of talking down their currency to export more to the US consumer whilst pursuading the Japanese people to continue to finance the whole enterprise.

Unlike the 70's oil crisis where the bill was ultimately paid by international investors left holding worthless sovereign debt the recycled Japanese trade surplus in the guise of the personal savings of the Japanese people is being used to finance the very US consumers whose ability to continue supporting their household debts, the coming US Federal deficit and consuming Japan's exports is in doubt.

To make matters worse Japan now finds itself having to compete with China for the US export market on which the Japanese economy depends.

The Japanese peoples savings which are being used to prop up the US dollar are in great peril.

For all their attempts to talk down the Yen the Japanese have failed to deal with the fundamental problem of an economy whose export performance depended upon the world's willingness to see them run a massive trade surplus with the rest of the world.

What started out as a generous gesture of support for a Japan reconstructing itself after WWII seems to have been perceived by the Japanese authorities as some sort of economic right that even now they believe they are able to assert.

The Japanese authorities will not be able to resist the combined effect of a structural decline of the US dollar and the rise of China as a competitor in the US market.

The Japanese people will pay for this with the loss of a substantial percentage their US dollar savings that is going to accompany the failure of the Japan's continuing attempt to prop up the US dollar against the might of the global foreign exchange markets.

It is coming down to the Japanese authorities attempting to stave off the global foreign exchange markets by throwing what remains of Japanese savings at propping up the US dollar while the Chinese sit it out with their low cost production denominated in a currency linked to the US dollar. Meanwhile it is only to be expected that as the Japanese people realise what is going on they are going to want to bring their savings back to Japan and convert them to Yen as fast as they can.

The Japanese authorities are relying on the US consumer regaining their appetite for Japanese imports before the Japanese people see the danger but don't seem to have taken account that any recovery in the US economy that takes place before the US dollar declines relative to the rest of the world is going to have to be met with a rapid rise in interest rates in order to finance the US current account deficit.

As interest rates rise US consumers will come under increasing pressure to reduce spending as well as redirect that spending towards lower cost producers such as China.

Investors willingness to finance the US current account in the knowledge that they are relying on an already shaky Japan to prop up the US dollar in the face of a fundamental economic readjustment to preserve the value of their investment is likely to be limited.

Europe and China will sit this out on the sidelines waiting to see how long it is before Japan goes the way of Argentina and has to acknowledge that it is in effect appropriating the US$ savings of its citizens to prop up the Japanese economy and the shareholders of Japan's banking system which is the root cause of its problems.

Until Japan reforms both its banks to deal with the legacy of the financial bubble of the late 80's and its mercantilist policy of relying on exports maintaining a perpetual trade surplus it will be in conflict with economic fundamentals and global financial markets.

Japan should take its place as a leading industrial economy and recognise, as the rest of the world does, that the failure to reform its domestic economy is destabilising the world economy.

China sitting on the sidelines is unlikely to agree to revalue its own US Dollar linked currency to reflect the increasing success of its own export led economic development whilst Japan is engaged in competitive devaluations with the US Dollar.

The Japanese have had over a decade to make the change from an export led strategy that served them well and only started leading to significant excesses in the 80''s. They have done nothing and continue to defy the calls to address their problems. It seems that the time is fast approaching when global financial markets are about to do it for them.

The 70's may yet come back to haunt us because those same oil producers who have made a point of maintaining their capital in US$ and conducting the oil business in US$ may find themselves facing enough political pressure in the coming months to set off a move away from the US dollar that Japan cannot resist.