SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Graystone who wrote (91911)12/18/2002 12:46:12 AM
From: E. Charters  Respond to of 116814
 
On the other hand, while not widely given credit for being prescient in this instance, I did not show the how I made that prediction. Now it can be told. After running a Linux cluster using FFT on all available volume data got by wiretapping Al Quaeda, OPEC, the Bildenberger group and the LBMA, I applied Shannon theory and linear regression to the collected cycles. When doing a final charting of the data, just as the prediction was to be plotted, the computer crashed, and all the data was lost. At at very moment a passing newspaper boy was talking to one of his chums and I heard him mention that the best gold he had every run into was from Acapulco. I realized then and there that the single best predictor, market sentiment, was starting to signal. And when market sentiment reaches the masses, it has reached a critical mass, where timing swings are as much a matter of how "you" feel as anything else. A way to simulate this is to effect a group neuroses experiment. In this method, when making crucial decisions, one adopts the thinking patterns of everyone who has ever disagreed with oneself for average reasons. This is the most likely average reaction of the market in buying and selling. Trade accordingly. (Important note: your placed trades should not necessarily be in accordance with the group's. Review the sucess ratios of the average trader and do some thinking here. Trading with expert traders in commodities will lose 75% of the time.)

Reverse infallibility is a useful method. Enter a stock broker's office and engage the people who trade the most in conversation in order to determine what they are losing. In general the biggest complainers and traders are the biggest losers. Make an agreement with them that you will trade "with" them. Whenever they go long, you short agressively and vice versa. If you are honest, you might consider sharing your winnings with them. It is very hard to do this with yourself as circular exhaustion is likely. It is easy to do it with someone else.

Certain traders on SI are incredibly sensitive barometers of reverse infallibility. I have identified persons whose very presence on the thread is evidence of a major move in a stock or metal. Generally their sentiment in total reverse of the direction it actually goes. Occasionally they are right, so some drawdowns are to be expected.

If you are in the business of prediction, you will quickly realize that it cannot be done on demand reliably. However I will tell you that odds are that a commodity will move towards the close of the PD. GT knows that. She is just a negative thinker. She got that way by knowing she was wrong most of the time when she was positive. However being negative does not cure the problem. Realizing that there is not one single human on the planet who knows the what the market will do tomorrow is the answer. Knowing what to do about it, when its direction is sensed reliably may the province of a few.

I am very sure gold is going higher next year. I am about 40% sure. Why? I told the thread, but of course when I did in that instance only one human individual knew that I was telling the plain unvarnished truth, which is what I always do, except when I am lying outrageously. Everyone else may have believed that I was fibbing, but those that did not, of course believe that it is inconsequential. I would agree with them on the latter.

So I will sum the reason very simply. People in whose interests it is for gold to have a higher price, can in part help it go that way at times. At least they can do so far more than you or I can.

I see some evidence of this process, and some evidence of the knowledge of this process, and in addition, market forces that are at this time preponderating.

In effect dug may be right. There is a conspiracy. You an I are part of it. It is impossible to calculate this percentage as my calculator does not do that many decimal places but we are in there somewhere.

I will apply a simple mathematical equation and predict the price of gold at 3 PM tomorrow. Most probably as you will see, I will be wrong.

EC<:-}



To: Graystone who wrote (91911)12/18/2002 1:44:38 AM
From: E. Charters  Respond to of 116814
 
Exactly what gold will do tomorrow. Gold will open at 334.80 to 336.20, it will hover there for about 1 hour and slowly move down below 335.60 where it will languish for 15 minutes, then heading back above it, will reach 338.10 by 11:39. It will fall back there and try 340 twice before finishing at 338.72. On the other hand if Ling Paio is out of his meeting early in Kowloon, he may take a large position and gold will take a spurt to 342.35 by the end of the day. This winter it is the summer of gold. Australians are going crazy. And as the race with the least distance overall to go to get there, this is sure to cause some interesting adventures.

If it does not do that or something similar I am mystified totally.

EC<:-}