Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (6115)	12/19/2002 1:51:27 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 39344

Partly the rollback i think, partly a misguided perception of iffiness in re the merger, partly that there was lots of new paper out on both companies this year, it had to find stable hands ... the latter hurt National more than Alamos for a while, but then they equalised out ... there was hard feeling in re Matter, i don't share it, he made a great deal on Salamandra, set the whole thing up ... but aas had/has the stronger following, name brand recognition, placement holders who don't dump ... and it's also partly the time of year, hey 18 December, 19 December only if you're west of Medicine Hat -g- .... January is different, and March is another thing entirely ... yes, i too wonder when a high-test NLW will pick up on new Alamos ... dropped a few hints -g- man.to - Manhattan will print .75, it has to to fill that gap-down ... after that i don't know what i'll do ... probably won't bet the ranch on the tambograndinos doing a complete and favourable re-think within the period of man's deal