SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Letmebe Frank who wrote (6145)1/8/2003 10:17:17 PM
From: Letmebe Frank  Respond to of 39344
 
I reviewed my Jan 6th Weekly Gold Monitor from BMO Nesbitt Burns. I was pleasantly surprised by Southernera's comparison to the gold stocks.

In the BMO Gold pages – Summary Statistics as of 03-Jan-03, the Adjusted Market Capitalization (Proven and Probable)[Fully Diluted In-The-Money Market Capitalization less Fully Diluted In The Money Working Capital plus Long-Term Debt less Other Assets plus P&P Capex]

8 Sr./ Int. Gold Producers Avg. = $213
9 Junior and Emerging Junior Gold Producers Avg. = $175
Southernera = $120

And of the Adjusted Market Capitalization (Total Allowable)[Fully Diluted In-The-Money Market Capitalization less Fully Diluted In-The-Money Working Capital plus Long-Term Debt less Other Assets plus Total Allowable Capex]

8 Sr./ Int. Gold Producers Avg. = $174
9 Junior and Emerging Junior Gold Producers = $148
Southernera = $75

Also puts the NAV/share of SUF at $C 10.57 (closed under 7 today)

So, anyone, how much of the difference is due to political risk in SA, or perhaps projections of the market for the future value of Gold vs. Platinum? Or maybe SUF.TO is undervalued relative to gold stocks.