SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonder who wrote (799)12/19/2002 2:17:16 PM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15987
 
zonder,it is not murder in the first place.You keep assuming that it is.
Murder:
1 : the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
m-w.com

It is not the murder of civilians with malice aforethought,but the killing of civilians,during war,made lawful by military necessity.



To: zonder who wrote (799)12/19/2002 2:22:55 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15987
 
The qualifier "wanton" links it into one thought: something is "wanton" only when it is not "justified". Going back, "murder" is not equivalent to "killing", but always implies deliberation and lack of justification, otherwise "collateral damage" would be counted as murder, and shooting rioting prisoners of war would be considered murder, which it is not necessarily. Also, interestingly,"Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory". Of course, it also says that it is not limited to these situations, but it is interesting that they qualify these acts as taking place during an occupation, not as part of an invasion, which suggests that they have in mind the ordinary definition of murder, and intend "wanton destruction of cities" to be in a wholly different category, associated, as I said, with the notion of military justification.........



To: zonder who wrote (799)12/19/2002 2:24:34 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 15987
 
It may be simpler if you look at it this way:

wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, OR [any other] devastation not justified by military necessity......