SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (331253)12/19/2002 6:42:59 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
sir paul agrees with you...

story.news.yahoo.com

McCartney defends decision to switch songwriting credit
Wed Dec 18, 6:02 PM ET

LONDON - Paul McCartney on Wednesday defended his decision to reverse the order of the famous Lennon-McCartney songwriting credit and urged Yoko Ono not to overreact.



After 40 years of second billing to his late partner John Lennon, McCartney has turned the tables on his Beatles collaborator in his latest project.

"Back in the U.S. Live 2002," a two-CD live album, includes 19 classic Beatles songs billed as written by "Paul McCartney and John Lennon."

"There's no question this is an attempted act of Beatle revisionism," Ono's spokesman Elliot Mintz said Tuesday. "And it does appear to be an attempt to rewrite history."

McCartney's spokesman Geoff Baker on Tuesday defended the switch and said it was not divisive. But on Wednesday the former Beatle spoke out himself and insisted the change was harmless.

"I think it is fair and accurate for the songs that John declared were mine to carry my name first," said McCartney.

"This isn't anything I'm going to lose any sleep over, nor is it anything that will cause litigation. But it seems to be harmless to me, after more than 30 years of it being the other way.

"The truth is that this is much ado about nothing and there is no need for anybody to get their knickers in a twist," McCartney added, using a popular British expression meaning to overreact.

(ej-acw)