SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChrisJP who wrote (111570)12/19/2002 10:47:07 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 150070
 
Thanks Chris, have a great holiday.



To: ChrisJP who wrote (111570)12/26/2002 3:03:53 PM
From: Taki  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 150070
 
Government Wants Tougher Punishment for Corporate Criminals

Washington, Dec. 26 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Justice
Department wants officers and directors of publicly traded
companies who ``abuse their position of trust'' to spend more time
in jail.
In letters sent to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the
Justice Department proposed revising federal sentencing guidelines
to impose stiffer penalties for directors and officers whose greed
jeopardizes the health of their publicly traded companies.
``Effective enforcement and deterrence require that penalties
be substantial and certain, with prison time being the rule, not
the exception, for those who violate the law in the course of
doing business,'' wrote Justice Department lawyer Eric Jaso.
After the fraud scandals at Enron Corp. and other public
companies, Congress directed the sentencing commission to ensure
that corporate criminals receive heightened penalties. The Justice
Department, in letters dated Oct. 1 and Dec. 18, expressed concern
that the commission was not going far enough and would send a
message to the public that ``fraud crimes are not taken
seriously.''
Criminals whose fraud activities cause a company more than $1
million in loss should go to prison for about five years, the
Justice Department said, while those responsible for more than
$100,000 in loss should receive about 18 months in prison.
``We believe the commission's action must ensure that white-
collar criminals are held fully accountable and must result in
tough, consistent, incarceratory penalties for those who would
threaten the integrity of our financial markets and our economy,''
Jaso wrote.

`Economic Dislocation'

The government said it wants to ``ensure that all but
relatively minor business crimes will result in prison for the
wrongdoer.''
The commission, expected to vote on sentencing guidelines
next month, is considering automatic sentence enhancements for
abuses by directors and officers of publicly traded corporations.
Generally, automatic enhancements result in more prison time. The
guidelines set by the commission are intended to lead to uniform
sentencing by federal judges across the U.S.
The Justice Department proposed heightened punishment for
directors and officers who abuse their position to further
criminal activity.
Also targeted are officials of publicly traded companies
whose acts result in ``substantial economic dislocation,'' such as
employee layoffs or ``serious'' financial loss to pension funds,
retirement accounts or individual stockholders.
The Justice Department recommended that the commission
stiffen penalties for obstruction of justice.
The Justice Department's Enron task force successfully
prosecuted Arthur Andersen LLP in June for obstructing justice by
destroying Enron Corp. documents that might have been of interest
to federal investigators.

`Lower Loss' Frauds

White-collar criminals responsible for more than $50,000 in
loss should also face prison, the Justice Department said.
``We believe that these penalty increases should apply not
only to the billion-dollar cases that have dominated the news
headlines in recent months, but also to the so-called `lower loss'
criminal fraud cases that make up the bulk of federal prosecutions
around the country,'' Jaso wrote to the commission.
The Justice Department expressed concern over judges using so-
called downward departures to give some fraud or theft criminals
lower penalties because of charitable work or ``extraordinary''
acceptance of responsibility.
Such a sentence ``feeds the public perception that
businesspeople who steal are treated far more leniently than
`street criminals,''' the Justice Department said.

--Anna Marie Stolley in Washington, (202) 654-1249 or
astolley@bloomberg.net. Editor: Asseo.

Story illustration: For the Justice Department's Web site, see:
usdoj.gov. For a series of screens on news about
corporate crime, see: {CNP 02521710102 <GO>}.