Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Valuepro who wrote (568)	12/20/2002 8:29:00 PM
From: Letmebe Frank	Respond to of 613

Hello VP - If I were to conjure up a best case scenario for TWG, it would be Gold continues a steady climb, say increasing $100/year (dreaming already), we sell Atlanta for peak dollar, use it to build a mine at Cargo, FT, or other cherry picked EM target and end up with same market cap of ABZ in 3 years, say 3 billion with no dilution along the way. But of course there would be hundreds of other stocks that would provide a better return, so this exercise is kinda silly. We need diamonds to make staying with TWG a good short or long term investment. Period. Regarding SUF splitting along PGMs and diamond/exploration lines it wouldn't surprise me that it happen within the next 2 years. We have no calculable market cap for diamonds built into the current share price. Something is better than nothing, especially if things get "hostile".