Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (62566)	12/20/2002 10:42:53 PM
From: William B. Kohn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'll remind you that most of the world was oppossed to stopping Hitler as well. Most of the world isn't necessarily a good thing. By the way reflect on how the world body, the UN, protected Bosnian Muslims in Screbenetsa (sic). The world wouldn't have protected the Kosovars, it was unilateral American action that saved them. The world didn't lift a finger in Rwanda. In Somalia, it was the US that began to feed the hungry, and paid for it with a very large price. The rest of the world was only to pleased to look the other way. My point, is the rest of the world is a sorry excuse for not taking action when action is necessary. Go ahead, find situations where the rest of the world actually did something positive, not on paper, but in fact. bill@wordsdon'tmeanjack.com