Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavesM who wrote (332053)	12/21/2002 2:00:13 AM
From: DavesM	Respond to of 769670

JF, sorry...Newark's numbers are .441M not 4.441 out of 2.033M

To: DavesM who wrote (332053)	12/21/2002 2:45:50 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"I don't understand your question." I don't totally understand how the segregation factor was calculated..... look at city #189.(0.050M AA / 1.198M total) Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA How can this area be considered so well integrated if 96% of the two cities are white???? Now if you look at the maps and charts in your link you will see that the deep south has a very high density of blacks all over each state approaching 50% of the total population in many areas...this is in contrast to a nationwide population of about 15%. This is why I think the south assimilation numbers place them so low on the segregation scale being used in that link. We all know that segregation, as a fact, is still very very common in the south and is a central issue to southern culture. The code word for this is "states rights"...