Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : 5spl -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dannobee who wrote (387)	12/21/2002 5:32:55 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 2534

The $500 psychic license fee is more than four times as much as it costs to register someone to take the Series 7. Then again, there are many, many more times the number of brokers than there are psychics, and the costs of entrenching a bureaucracy can't be cheap. But before I heap disgust and skepticism upon the well-meaning government: what psychic who didn't see this coming in advance - assuming that among the things they utilize their mystical prescience for are regulatory trends - deserves the public's hard earned scratch, anyway? LPS5

To: dannobee who wrote (387)	12/23/2002 6:26:17 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 2534

Sun Gets Injunction in Microsoft Case Monday, December 23, 3003 (AP) by FOSTER KLUG, Associated Press Writer BALTIMORE - Microsoft must include rival Sun Microsystem's Java programming language in its Windows operating system, a federal judge ruled Monday, handing Sun a victory as it pursues its private antitrust case. Sun had argued during a three-day hearing earlier this month before U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz that Microsoft has gained an unfair advantage by shipping Windows — used by more than 90 percent of the world's personal computers — with an outdated version of Java that's inconsistent for its users. "In the final analysis, the public interest in this case rests in assuring that free enterprise be genuinely free, untainted by the effects of antitrust violations," Motz said in his ruling. Software developers are turning to Microsoft's .NET platform instead of gambling on Microsoft's spotty distribution of Java, Sun attorneys told Motz during the hearing. Microsoft attorneys countered that at least half the world's software developers already use Java, which was designed to run small applications independent of any particular operating system. "Competition is not only about winning the prize; its deeper value lies in giving all those who choose to compete an opportunity to demonstrate their worth," Motz wrote. "If .NET proves itself to be a better product than Java, it should — and will — predominate in the market." Motz wrote that if Microsoft's system was to remain dominant, "it should be because of .NET's superior qualities, not because Microsoft leveraged its PC monopoly to create market conditions in which it is unfairly advantaged." In asking for the injunction, Sun said that if it waited until its $1 billion antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft was settled, it would be too far behind to compete. In the antitrust suit, Sun accuses Microsoft of intentionally creating incompatibilities with competitors' products. It also charges that Microsoft forced other companies to distribute or use products incompatible with Java. The case is one of four private antitrust lawsuits that followed a federal judge's ruling in a lawsuit filed by the Justice Department and 18 states. The court had found that Microsoft acted as an illegal monopoly based on its dominance in desktop operating systems.