Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BigBull who wrote (62671)	12/21/2002 3:18:12 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

You know, back channel deal with the mullahs After 911, State went to "Madison Ave" cooler ways to sell the Arabs, and this is the kind of nonsense they come up with. They will tell you the ratings are higher. How do they know, and who cares? They have lost the message in the attempts to "be nice to the Muslims."

To: BigBull who wrote (62671)	12/24/2002 12:22:28 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>U.S., Britain Plan Seaborne Attack on Iraq-Source Sat December 21, 2002 05:01 PM ET By Peter Graff LONDON (Reuters) - The United States and Britain are planning a massive seaborne invasion of Iraq from the Gulf as the first stage in any ground war, a British defense ministry source said on Saturday. "Discussions on future amphibious operations are at an advanced stage," the source said, adding that Britain would commit its elite 3 Commando Brigade of Royal Marines to the proposed invasion. In the 1991 Gulf War, U.S.-led forces assembled a large amphibious task force in the Gulf, but never mounted an assault by sea. Instead, infantry poured into parts of Iraq and Kuwait from Saudi Arabia by land. The British defense ministry source said planners were this time leaning toward an amphibious assault in the case of a war with Iraq in part because of the difficulties of protecting a large ground-based army from chemical or biological attack. "Would you really put 200,000 troops in one place and let them be targets for an attack?" the source said. The amphibious option also reduces the diplomatic and political sensitivity of moving large land forces into countries in the region which have not yet publicly given consent for their territory to be used as a launch-pad for an invasion. Other ground forces could deploy later, after amphibious forces had already opened up a front, the British source said. CONTROL OF MAIN SEA LANES The United States, Britain and any other allies that join them would have an easier time launching a seaborne attack this time than in 1991 because they already control the main sea lanes into Iraq and have made sure they are free from mines. Over the past year, Australian, U.S. and British warships patrolling the Gulf to enforce U.N. sanctions on Iraq have moved their operations from international waters into Iraqi territory, Reuters reported from aboard warships in the region last week. The allied navies now operate freely up to the mouths of the Khor Abd Allah and Shaat Al Arab estuaries, where Iraq's great rivers spill over salt marshes into the Gulf. The Shaat Al Arab gives access to Iraq's main port of Basra on the Euphrates. Three British mine-clearing ships are in the Gulf helping make sure the waterways are clear. Britain's 3 Commando Brigade, the elite force that made up the main British contribution to fighting in Afghanistan last year, would send about 3,000 men to the amphibious operation to join a much larger contingent of Americans. A large British naval task force is due to sail from Britain at the end of January, and would presumably include the amphibious units. Britain and the United States both say that Iraq has failed to supply a complete account of its missiles and nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs, as required by a tough-worded U.N. Security Council resolution. Washington and London indicated that the prospect of a war to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in early 2003 was now increasingly likely.<< reuters.com