SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Those Damned Democrat's -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (884)12/21/2002 11:00:53 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 1604
 
In the End, Southern Senators Rose Against Lott


By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 22, 2002; Page A01

URL:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23904-2002Dec21.html

Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) had decided Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) could not and should not survive as the incoming majority leader. Allen, serving as a front man for one of Lott's likely successors, picked up the phone to tell him so.

It was late Wednesday afternoon, 36 hours before Lott resigned as Senate GOP leader. Allen and several other southern senators had been conspiring for four days to replace Lott with Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), a heart-lung transplant surgeon President Bush affectionately calls "Fristy."

After Lott's birthday party gaffe about segregation, he had been frozen out of the strategy session as a part of his own caucus, which was holding conference calls without him. Sources said Allen's ultimatum, an uncharacteristically aggressive move for a politician who nurtures a down-home image, was one of the pivotal moments in behind-the-scenes maneuvering following the careless Dec. 5 comment by Lott that ultimately cost him his job.

Until that point, according to sources close to Lott, no senator had directly told him he should step down. Some senators had been calling Lott in seclusion at his home in Pascagoula, Miss., and using the elegant yet murky language of the Senate to warn of "negative assessments" about his political viability. Many pledged their support, although friends say it weighed on Lott's mind that he had won his first secret-ballot leadership election, as whip back in 1994, by one vote after thinking he had commitments for a wider margin of victory.

Allen recalled in an interview yesterday that after small talk about how torturous the situation must be for Lott and his family, "I got to the point, which was that we needed a new leader."

Lott acted surprised, according to several sources.

"Trent said he thought he had a had a lot of good support, strong support and that he could be a strong leader and a strong campaigner," Allen said. "He mentioned that he had a majority of senators with him. And I said: Well, regardless, I just thought it was in the best interest of the country, and our principles, our philosophy, the issues we were trying to advance that he step down."

Much public attention has been focused on the role of the White House in Lott's downfall. A public repudiation by Bush, followed by his silence on the issue, set the climate for the coup in the Senate. But the opposition didn't come to a head until a small group of senators, acting out of their own ambition as well as concern about the damage the spectacle was doing to their party, forced Lott out long before the leadership meeting that had been scheduled for Jan. 6.

Frist's backers said the clubby Senate was quite slow to turn on Lott for his remarks at a centennial salute to Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.), in which Lott spoke wistfully of Thurmond's segregationist campaign for president in 1948.

"This unguarded comment, meant as a compliment, had unleashed something unbelievable," said a Republican strategist who still sounded stunned by what he had just lived through. "Through the end, there was a huge sense among most senators that the new caricature of Trent Lott was not the real Trent Lott. I don't think anybody thought this was fair, but a majority concluded it was necessary."

Sources said that during their Wednesday conversation, Lott asked Allen if he could "hold off on this a day" before going public with the fact that he had asked Lott to resign. Allen agreed. But Lott did not act swiftly enough to satisfy Allen, who accelerated plans to depose him.

Frist, 50, was still basking in the midterm victories that he helped secure as chairman of the Senate GOP's campaign committee, and he is a specialist in medical policy at a time when Bush is preparing to make health care his signature domestic issue next year.

Allen, also 50, will replace Frist next month as head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, and the two message each other constantly on their BlackBerry wireless e-mail terminals. "Call me," Allen wrote Frist on Saturday morning, Dec. 14. Frist called Allen when he was in a Fairfax County park, playing quarterback for both teams in a touch football game with youngsters from the neighborhood.

"I said, 'Bill, I can foresee no scenario where this issue is going to get any better. I only see it getting worse,' " Allen said. "I asked him to consider running or standing for leader. Over the weekend he at least said, 'If it doesn't get like that, I would consider.' "

Allen's role was but one part of a multidimensional drama. Participants cautioned that no one knows the full story. "There were thousands of conversations, and no one was privy to all of them, including Senator Frist," an official said.

At least one other group of coup plotters was working on a separate but parallel track, according to aides. Sen. Don Nickles (R-Okla.), who believed he had the support of several conservatives, telephoned Bush's senior adviser, Karl Rove, that same Saturday and told him he planned to use a Sunday, Dec. 15, interview program to call for a leadership election. Rove did not stop him. Rove made and took calls about the issue throughout the week, but White House officials insisted he was gathering information and not influencing the process.

"The White House deftly did Lott in with deadly public silence, and left very few fingerprints," said William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard.

Frist, who started with the votes of the eight incoming senators he had helped elect, swiftly outstripped Nickles in building support to succeed Lott. Aides said Frist stayed cagey about his intentions until Thursday morning. Then, he authorized Allen and roughly a half dozen other senators to begin calling Republicans to ask their opinions, with the real mission of promoting Frist as a replacement.

An aide called this group "Frist's offensive line." Participants would not identify all of them, because some of them were believed to be assuring Lott at the same time that they supported him. But numerous sources agreed that the core group included Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.), Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.) and former representative Jim Talent, a White House favorite who is the newly elected senator from Missouri.

It was made to look like a draft. Associates said that Frist had been initially reluctant to run for the job. Some associates said Frist wanted to be available if Vice President Cheney decided not to run for reelection with Bush, and these associates said the job of majority leader could distract from a possible run for the White House in 2008.

But with Lott at his weakest and with Bush's inner circle subtly promoting him, Frist pounced. Wearing alligator-skin boots as he dialed, Frist followed up the linemen's calls with his own. "Our caucus needs help," he told one senator, fretting aloud about the possible damage to the Senate as well as to the party and its agenda.

All week, Frist and his brain trust had been taking soundings about the Senate from a circle of outside advisers that included Vin Weber, a former member of the House Republican leadership who now is managing partner of the Washington office the Clark & Weinstock management consulting firm.

Sen. Robert F. Bennett (R-Utah) talked to Frist on Wednesday, Dec. 18. "I wasn't entirely sure he was going to run," Bennett said. "He didn't say he wouldn't, but he said his personal goals centered mainly on health care and moving that issue along. Obviously he had had some conversations with people in the administration, but I didn't have the sense that he was acting as the president's agent, or that Karl Rove had put him up to this."

A source said Frist consciously avoided contact with Rove.

With word of the calls racing through the Capitol on Thursday afternoon, Frist issued a statement saying he would consider challenging Lott. Lott gave up the next morning, after his friend Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who as the incoming whip will be second in the GOP leadership, told him the situation was hopeless. McConnell said in an interview that he suggested Lott "step down immediately."

Frist had such a head start on the race to succeed Lott that three possible challengers, including McConnell, folded within hours. Nickles endorsed Frist. Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), who will be third in the leadership, continued prospecting for several hours after Lott's announcement but then bowed out under pressure from McConnell and others who told him unity was essential.

Staff writers Dan Balz, David S. Broder and Helen Dewar contributed to this report.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company



To: calgal who wrote (884)1/1/2003 11:11:55 AM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 1604
 
For years, Democrats have groused about their inability to balance what they see as the increasing influence over the electorate by advocates of Republican policies.
But they say their concerns have taken on a new urgency because of the rise to the top of the cable news ratings by the Fox News Channel, considered by many to have a conservative slant, and the loss of the Senate to the Republicans in November. Some Democrats say the election outcome enhanced the influence of Fox News and personalities like Mr. Limbaugh.

The efforts among influential Democrats, particularly liberals, range from a grass-roots talent search for progressive radio hosts to the creation of research organizations to provide a Democratic spin for the news media, to nascent discussions by wealthy supporters about starting a cable network with a liberal bent.

People working on these projects acknowledged they were venturing into territory where liberals have failed and failed again, most notably with the short-lived radio programs of Mario M. Cuomo and Jim Hightower, not to mention Phil Donahue's struggling liberal talk show on MSNBC.

However, they said, the recent Republican gains have perhaps set the backdrop for the emergence of an angry liberal who could claim the same outsider status that worked so well for Mr. Limbaugh in the early 1990's.

The hurried efforts by Democrats to find more powerful media voices come after years of carping but little action.

"If you start from the premise that the message was right, which we do, then the problem was that it wasn't getting out to the people," said one official of the Democratic Party who spoke on condition that his name not be used.

With that sentiment, there is a sense within the leadership ranks that the party erred in not building a media support system after the 2000 presidential election, when it lost the media coordination of the Clinton White House.

"Across the board, we need to muscle up," said John Podesta, the former White House chief of staff for Bill Clinton and now a law professor at Georgetown University. "That means from the Congressional operations to the party committees to the think-tank world to, most significantly, beefing up our capacity to communicate with the public in all forms of media, not just through obscure Internet Web sites but on television and radio."

For his part, Mr. Podesta is discussing with the Internet entrepreneur Steven T. Kirsch and others the creation of a liberal version of the Heritage Foundation, the conservative research group that, along with others of its kind, is credited with helping start the modern conservative movement.

The foundation is part of a circuit of influential conservative groups that are credited with helping to hone a singular message, bolstered each Wednesday at back-to-back meetings held by Grover Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform, and the conservative activist Paul Weyrich. Those meetings are monitored and at times attended by some conservative commentators, columnists and Internet writers.

Democrats have long claimed that the circuit has corralled conservative thinkers, and more important, conservative media, into a disciplined message of the week that gets repeated attention from Web sites like the Drudge Report, Mr. Limbaugh's radio show, Fox News's prime-time talk shows and the editorial pages of The Washington Times and The Wall Street Journal.

Mr. Kirsch, chief executive of the Propel Internet service and a Democratic fund-raiser, said the foundation he and Mr. Podesta envision would do the same for liberals.

"During the last 10 years the opposition has become more organized and the liberals haven't adapted to counter it," Mr. Kirsch said. "We will have components that will include messaging, message delivery and coordination of progressive groups so progressives will speak with more of a unified voice."

Should the organizers succeed at starting a foundation, it would not have anywhere near the number of prominent, outright partisan media voices that its conservative counterparts do.

Democrats can point to a scant few. Their most prominent television advocates, James Carville and Paul Begala on "Crossfire" and Bill Press on CNN's "Buchanan and Press," square off each day against conservative counterparts. Mr. Donahue stands alone on MSNBC, but his program has struggled some against the far more watched Bill O'Reilly on Fox and Connie Chung on CNN.

Conservatives have Mr. Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Reagan and Neal Boortz, who collectively draw an audience of at least 30 million people per week with a strictly conservative message.

They are led, of course, by Mr. Limbaugh, with an estimated audience of up to 20 million people a week, and Mr. Hannity, with nearly 10 million. Democrats, most recently Al Gore (news - web sites), have also complained that the Fox News Channel, overseen by the former Republican strategist Roger E. Ailes, slants its coverage against Democrats, a charge Mr. Ailes denies. Its average nightly audience of about 1.3 million people is the largest in cable news.

In one of the more ambitious of the ideas circulating, a group of wealthy Democratic supporters is toying with the idea of starting a liberal cable network. That endeavor would cost in the hundreds of millions and require the backing of a media company with enough leverage to force it onto the major cable systems.

Democratic officials said that they had discussed a similar idea with Haim Saban, a media mogul and party supporter, a couple of years ago, as Fox News began its ascent, but that he ultimately decided against it, in large part because of the odds against success.

Mr. Saban had no comment, but an associate played down the seriousness of the discussions.

Still, Rob Glaser, the founder and chief executive of RealNetworks, the Internet video service, said he believed there was room to create a progressive version of Fox News.

"There is a hole in the market right now," Mr. Glaser said. "From my personal standpoint, holes in the market are opportunities."

Democrats said a far more readily achievable goal would be to foster national liberal radio personalities.

The task has fallen to a newly formed group, Democracy Radio Inc. It is overseen by a former Democratic Congressional staffer, Tom Athens, with help from, among others, Paul W. Fiddick, the Clinton administration assistant secretary for agriculture and a co-founder of the Heritage Media Corporation.

"We're going to go out and identify talent and help them to create programming and actually connect them with local stations," Mr. Athens said. "We want to plant a thousand seeds and see how many flowers actually arise."

But if history is any guide, the soil may not be fertile. Liberal radio programs have not worked very well in the past. Liberals and conservatives said they believed this was in part because the most prominent liberal hosts have tended to present policy issues in all of their dry complexity while refraining from baring fangs against conservative opponents.

"Most liberal talk shows are so, you know, milquetoast, who would want to listen to them?" said Harry Thomason, the Hollywood producer who is close to Bill Clinton. "Conservatives are all fire and brimstone."

Mr. Athens said his group would encourage its hosts to be more brazen and entertaining.

"Progressives have this problem: They sound too erudite, it's like eggheads talking at you," Mr. Athens said. "We believe that progressive talk radio can be every bit as successful as conservative talk radio if people present and format a show that people like."

Conservatives are skeptical that all of this planning will do the Democrats much good. "It's not a matter of packaging or meetings, it's a matter of ideas," Mr. Hannity said. "The public isn't interested in the kind of liberalism that the Democratic party has come to represent."

Robert Novak, the syndicated columnist and part of the conservative team on CNN's "Crossfire," said the Democrats were making too much about the efficacy of the conservative research organizations. Mr. Novak said he sent a staff member to Mr. Norquist's meetings. But, he said, while the information shared at the meetings is "helpful, it's hardly a decisive factor" in what he writes in his column or says on television.

story.news.yahoo.com.



To: calgal who wrote (884)1/9/2003 5:58:26 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 1604
 
I wasn't Aware that Women could work in Afganastan!.. Read the article.....
WASHINGTON — Sen. Patty Murray on Wednesday defended comments she made last month that seemed to praise terror leader Usama bin Laden for his humanitarian efforts.
The Democratic senator from Washington said she’s no big fan of the terrorist leader and that the media has misconstrued remarks she made to a group of advanced placement students in her home state on Dec. 18.

"I have to tell you that it's really important that people don't twist or construe remarks that were made to an AP student group in a Vancouver high school," she told Fox News in a Senate corridor after attending a "power coffee" with the 13 other women senators on Capitol Hill.

"We all know -- everyone in this country knows -- that Usama bin Laden is an evil terrorist and in my remarks I told the students we're taking the right steps now. The question is what do we do next ... and it's an important question," Murray said.

In the meeting with students, Murray asked why bin Laden is so popular in some places around the world. Her answer was caught on tape by the school’s video department.

"He's been out in these countries for decades building schools, building roads, building infrastructure, building day care facilities, building health care facilities and people are extremely grateful," she said. "He's made their lives better. We have not done that."

Outcry against Murray's comments was immediate, even among some who think the United States should give more foreign aid to Afghanistan.

"She should know better than that -- [bin Laden] is public enemy No. 1 and is behind despicable things. To use him for effect is outrageous," said Josh Feit, editor of The Stranger, Seattle's alternative weekly paper.

Several experts said it’s true bin Laden has spent some of his money in the Sudan and Afghanistan on infrastructure projects such as building hospitals, schools and roads.

But they say most of those roads were built to take soldiers to and from training camps, the schools built were madrasas, which often indoctrinate students to the bin Laden brand of Islam, and the hospitals were not intended for average Muslims but for injured Mujahadeen fighters battling the Soviets.

Diplomats, biographers and aid workers all say bin Laden’s popularity does not stem from his benevolence, but from his message of hate towards Israel and the United States.

"I think he developed a following because he became the embodiment of someone who would represent the powerless and confront the powerful," said Fox News contributor Dennis Ross, a former ambassador and director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

In fact, the United States is the largest international donor of aid to several countries where bin Laden is popular, and was so even before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Recently, the United States gave $320 million in aid to Afghanistan, mostly in the form of food and refugee assistance, thus providing 80 percent of the international relief given to that country.

Some have also criticized the disproportionate response to Murray’s comments compared to the drubbing given to former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., who resigned from his leadership post after a huge public outcry over remarks he made regarding segregationist policies of the past.

But there are others in Murray’s corner, including several in Seattle’s anti-war coalition who believe she is right.

"I would believe that as a fundamentalist, he believes very much in the values of his religion and that he would have been providing charity," said Alice Woldt of the Church Council of Seattle.

Murray’s defenders have said her remarks were made off the cuff, but the tape showed the senator using those words as her closing statements, which may have left a lasting impression.

The GOP is now seizing the moment. Republicans, and even President Bush, are said to be trying to draft Rep. Jennifer Dunn to run against Murray in the 2004 election.

foxnews.com