SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (332505)12/22/2002 11:32:05 AM
From: epicure  Respond to of 769670
 
Poor, poor smokers. You know that nudists are discriminated against too. I think I would prefer nudity in restaurants to smoking, though. As an asthmatic, smoke causes me to gag. I don't think anyone has a right to pollute the air. If they could smoke and keep it all in, I wouldn't mind, but of course they can't. The air is public, and you don't have a right to foul it so other people can't breathe. Perhaps we need little personal bubble for smokers, so they could go around in a cloud of carcinogens? I'd be just fine with that. The mortality tables, afterall, would be really messed up of people stopped smoking.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (332505)12/22/2002 1:40:35 PM
From: A. Borealis  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Discrimination?? Smoker's rights??
There is not one smoker being FORCED to "stand outside in
the cold air". There is not one smoker being denied seating
in an indoor establishment.

Smokers' presence in public places is not the cause of complaints.
It's the SMOKE, dummy!!

Borealis