Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (333421)	12/23/2002 6:07:20 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

neo, it's your inability to integrate many data points over time. Hell, you can't remember things a couple of days old. neo consider tangible and intangible. Do I argue often on tangible aspects, far more than most anyone on this thread. Is a legal vote tangible(ie the electors vote) and all other counts argued on intangible valuations. So you suggest in years since the vote I always argued the intangible over the tangible and then refuted a statement you made using the tangible rationale within minutes.... Do think looking back a couple of months and posting something covers even a small part of the number of posts on this issue over a couple of years. An then when I correct you you say you are certain I am being dishonest. A reply made with how thought. Your suggestions of what I argue and your inability to fathom what I post is about simplistic and shallow thinking. Or maybe it's you ability to remember details. Standing by your assertion that I am dishonest is plain old stupidity. Make a case to Mr. Allen in PM or public. He may have a far better memory that you. Read my posts to others in the last few days. Did I argue the intangible and a lot of tangible. As to certainty, in this instance you were wrong. You were never correct. LOL... It's fun to be able to use the word never once in a while.