Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3495)	12/24/2002 6:08:25 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 7720

"9 months is not equivalent to murder" argument. Well, paying child support isn't either. Therefore either no exceptions are allowed or abortion should be legal. The argument made by some (which I DO NOT support) is that forcing the woman to bear the child is making her a slave of the child. However if she put the child in the position of requireing her support or dieing then this would mean that she is responsible for its care even if it does allow the child to force her body to labor for its (the child's) benefit. prior to Roe v. Wade RAPE WAS NOT CONSIDERED JUSTIFICATION FOR ABORTION! I think it was in some states. In any case I think I have had enough of arguing for a case that I do not really support. :) Merry Christmas Tim