SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve dietrich who wrote (333674)12/25/2002 2:28:06 AM
From: J.B.C.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Not at all Steve, principles are usually proven to be good or bad by taking them to limits, 0 or infinity. This is a mainstay in science and employed through the use of calculus. Ken keeps asking to extend the unemployment benefits for those laid off, so I say why not make it a life time benefit for laid off workers? Ponder the question and the impact, not whether it would really happen or not.

So Steve do you support providing lifetime benefits to laid off employees?

Jim



To: steve dietrich who wrote (333674)12/25/2002 8:15:49 AM
From: J.B.C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Actually this really isn't "ad absurdum" ( I love it when liberals try to talk sophisticated, I bet you're real fun at a party Steve). 8 years ago we never heard of prescription drug program, now we want to give life time benefits to people when they turn 65. Lets give laid-off workers life time unemployment benefits, why stop at adding 13 weeks. Do you support that proposal?

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News