SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hmaly who wrote (156763)12/26/2002 11:56:09 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580139
 
As the representative of the second party, Vance chose to make political hay and misconstrue her comments but most people saw through his maneuvering.

Most people in Miss. think Trent was right also; however come next election, you can bet Murray will be explaing her words in a more precise and careful manner; especially if we go to war with Iraq.


You think? I doubt it. Of course, a lot will depend on how much political mileage the WA state GOP thinks they will get out of it.

If we give so much aid, then the question I think we need to ask ourselves is why is all this aid not getting us the goodwill we so very much need.

And if she would have said it that way, I wouldn't have had a problem.


She did say it that way; you intentionally chose not to get it.

In fact, in her retraction, she did say the US was starting to put money into broadcasting or telling our side. Another one of GW great ideas I believe.

Oh, I see.......when Bush says it or does it, its okay.

That's the point Ms. Murray was trying to make. Winning the war on terrorism will take more than just military might to win.

Hogwash. She voted against the war.


How uninformed can you get.......she didn't vote against the war on terrorism.

She was trying to say the war could be won with just good deeds alone.

No, she wasn't.

Which is false, as the Taliban gov, OBL and the clerics controlled the media in Afghanistan, just as Saddam controls the media in Iraq. That is why we weren't getting our message out in Afghanistan, and won't in Iraq; and she apparently wasn't bright enough to understand that.

How would you know if our message is getting out or not? Have you been to Iraq or Afghanistan? Of course not, it would be too unpatriotic to check out what's going on over there. Besides, its so much easier to condemn someone who's point of view you can't be bothered to understand.

No wonder the Japanese Americans were interred during WW II; any time someone objected, there were people like you all so ready to call the objectors unAmerican and unpatriotic.......if not worse.

ted