Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (18617)	12/26/2002 12:29:43 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

However, the response of the Arab world leaves real doubt in most US observers that any US policy would win any kudos from the Arab world Are you suggesting that the main motivation of US policy makers is to gain Kudos? I would assume that the US would do whatever is "right" according to its own principles and benefits. Not according to whether or not it gains applause from the Arabs. In this light, I still believe the US should intervene in the Isr/Pal problem and impose a solution to both sides, regardless of whether or not it will win kudos. Seriously, I don't think "both sides" showed incapability, only one You are ignoring Sharon's hostilities, not the least of which is to continue expanding the settlements into Palestinian territories. the side that said "no" and walked off without ever making or countering an offer, then started a war I saw a post today on the AMZN thread on why the proposal was not acceptable to Palestinians. You might find it interesting: siliconinvestor.com