Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (156877)	12/27/2002 9:51:35 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579732

Absolutely. Since the "failed" Clinton/Carter agreement, NK has managed to build 2 nukes (assuming this is not a lie to deter Bush). Now the press has said that they will be capable of building two a month. Draw your own conclusions Dr Watson. My conclusion is that Bill Clinton entered into a horribly structured, unenforceable agreement with NK, and we are seeing the result of it today with a NK that now has greatly enhanced nuclear capability. My conclusion is that if George Bush were NOT to insist on the ouster of Saddam, or at least a verifiable disarming, we would, in a few years, be faced NOT ONLY with this problem Clinton created in NK, but a second problem with Iraq. I have long maintained on this thread that Clinton's worst foreign policy failure was that of allowing Iraq to run over us. Now, the evidence is clear that I've been wrong: Iraq was the second worst, and NK was the worst. Clinton was a weak, weak, selfish president. I wish I could say we're getting what we deserve for electing the creep; but what we have gotten is so much worse than that. Clinton's incompetence may well result in World War III.