Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (156890)	12/28/2002 10:02:20 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584146

I like Hagel...because he talks sensibly. Of course you do -- Hagel is a freaking liberal. unopposed Bush would be in Baghdad now. Unopposed? He's the president. He makes the decision. He has the backing of Congress. If he WANTED to be in Baghdad now, he would have done so. The reality is that you are a weak liberal, just like Carter, and you can't comprehend the value in a strong military and using it to make the world a safer place. In the time I've been posting here I cannot remember EVEN ONE sensible comment you have made with respect to national defense. You ALWAYS seem to side with the enemy, like Baghdad Jim or Barbra. And you deny the basic truth that the only way to negotiate with Saddam is to shove your position down his throat by force. It isn't your fault--you are an extremist liberal, and liberals don't have the equipment to comprehend these issues.

To: Alighieri who wrote (156890)	12/28/2002 10:47:45 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1584146

Alighieri Re...unopposed Bush would be in Baghdad now. And the problem with that would be? If the Us took Iraq unopposed, wouldn't that be wonderful; as we could then rid Iraq of their WMD, feed the children, and establish a representative gov.; quit paying terrorists to bomb Israel; bring stability back to the region. What is the downside here? Only a liberal would think that saving the lives of thousands of children would be wrong, because a republican president did it. I am a conservative, and yet I believe it was right of Bill to save the lives of thousands of children in Yugoslavia. Was I also wrong because Bill was a democrat? According to your standards I am.

To: Alighieri who wrote (156890)	12/28/2002 3:20:42 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584146

You don't know enough about me to make the comments you make. I have told you this before...I dislike Bush because he has surrounded himself with a bunch of belligerent demagogues. I do not dislike him because he is a republican. I like Hagel...because he talks sensibly. He is a republican. I like Lugar for the same reasons. Also a republican. I have been following this topic from day one and I am telling you this...unopposed Bush would be in Baghdad now. Everyone but you seems to know it. Al, don't forget Colin Powell. Isn't it surprising there are so many we think are okay? <g> ted