Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (18337)	12/28/2002 7:22:54 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Good Morning, Something from your side of the pond: guardian.co.uk <Snip> Colleagues of ex-President Bush were particularly irked by the round-robin they received from George Snr and Barbara this Christmas: "Young George W is getting on just fine in his new job of President of the United States (thanks for the help, Jeb!). He is looking forward to starting World War Three in the new year and Dad has been helping him find Iraq on the old family atlas. Coincidentally, this is also the time that he'll be beginning his campaign for re-election, and as Dubya says: 'I will not be impedemented!' " <End Snip> I'm feeling certain that O'Farrell won't be a guest on Limbaugh's show anytime soon. Cheerio! Ray

To: jttmab who wrote (18337)	12/28/2002 12:43:50 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

It was far from a direct response. Non sequitur was the precise way to define it. Let me see if I can help illustrate by using an illogical inference based on one sentence of this post. res -It's good morning here. "since you didn't speak to me online yesterday, I'm glad I brightened your morning". See, an illogical inference, not based on anything you wrote, but based solely on your own mental model of what you wanted to believe. Speaking of "sophistry". :)