Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (156907)	12/28/2002 11:13:17 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580163

He clearly did not have to answer as he did.... The answer is calculated to indirectly manipulate Bush The answer was CALCULATED to DIRECTLY MANIPULATE North Korea. This is what Rumsfeld does best, and why he may be the best Secretary of Defense in my 50 years...

To: Alighieri who wrote (156907)	12/28/2002 4:20:42 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580163

The Secretary of Defense has said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about "attacking" NK. Nothing. He has merely said that if necessary we could handle wars on two fronts at one time, IN RESPONSE to a reporter's question. A totally appropriate answer for the question. That's bull$hit and you should know it. He clearly did not have to answer as he did. He is very good at using third person responses to avoid answering questions, but chose to play a radical, shocking line again. It's all he knows. The answer is calculated to indirectly manipulate Bush. Much as the language that was fed to him in the AoE speech was. And GW doesn't know he is stepping into a mine field. Al, well said. Rumsfield is a dangerous man.......as is Sharon, both have us at war with Iraq before a shot is fired. ted