Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (156987)	12/29/2002 9:35:17 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580032

David, I think it's time for ted to take another vacation. And it's all your fault. Again. Steve

To: i-node who wrote (156987)	12/29/2002 9:31:54 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580032

Fourth largest military? This has been exposed for the lie it is. Where have you been? It was at the time the fourth largest military in the world. I believe we've discussed this here before. abcnews.go.com; Apparently, you don't read your own links very well. The article in the link above points out that Iraq's active army had 375k men......far less than the 1.2 million it claimed when it considered itself the 4th largest army. That same point is made in the conclusion [Section IV] of what I believe to be a Pentagon report on the Gulf War shown in the link below. It states that the Pentagon overestimated the numbers in Iraq's army and that, in fact, the number was 375k men. However, this is not news.......apparently, most of the world new that Iraq did not have the 4th largest army except you and your partner in crime, Fudd. geocities.com ted