Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (156989)	12/29/2002 6:34:59 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1580485

Alighieri. Re..Because this is not poker where the worst that happens is you lose money. To call a bluff, one doesn't have to be playing poker. Calling a bluff can be a wise move, especially when Gw holds most of the cards. A non aggression pact. I wonder where they get the idea that we would attack them pre-emptively? Got me? AFAIK GW never said we would attack NK, if they started their reactors . Bill is the one who threatened to attack in 94 however. GW, along with everybody else in the pact discontinued the old shipments. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/DL25Dg01.html As far as a non aggresion pact, Gw said he would be willing to negotiate one if NK is willing to stop building nuclear bombs. I see nothing wrong with that precondition. Gw may have to give up that precondition, but that is premature at this point.