Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (18451)	12/30/2002 2:19:36 AM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Who is "we?" You sound like there are more than one of you. No, you haven't explained why you are so intent on your position since it clearly does not affect your rights. You've obfuscated with intellectual snobbery, but you haven't explained why it makes a difference to you personally. I can sort of understand why a fatcat like Ted Kennedy would argue against the Second Amendment. He after all lost two brothers to the illegal use of illegal firearms. So he has standing. Sarah Brady, for all her misguided efforts has standing. You don't, unless you disclose what it is. We are defending the correct interpretation of the 2nd. Indeed. Not. The NRA would love to get cases into the Supreme Court, but the founding fathers left too many land mines and the USSC does not appear to have the cajones to go looking for them.