Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (18893)	12/29/2002 7:31:28 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57110

Printers are cheap and deliver photo quality. Any one of the better ones will do. I have an Epson Stylus Photo 750 that produces exceptional images and it is at least 2 years old. I bet there is better and cheaper available. Ink is also expensive and not quite long lasting yet, but getting there. The problem for you is getting images scanned if you still use film. I have a Nikon LS2000 scanner. But Digital camera interfaces are far easier. If you buy a scanner, make sure it works with your OS. A flatbed scanner is not high enough quality for scanning slides or negatives. The world of cameras will be digital in 4-7 years, if not sooner. M