Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (1258)	12/30/2002 2:20:31 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Pray tell....as if how dare one doubt you? Not at all. Your position was not clear and you were not supporting it with anything. Just a statement saying it does not apply. Should others never doubt you, never ask for supporting evidence to your statements? Are you saying that there would be no nuclear fallout or radioactive rain from a nuclear attack? That is not what I read on the subject at all. Granted that no nuclear incident is the same and of course the accidental meltdown of a nuclear power plant is in some ways different than a direct nuclear bomb, there is still nuclear fallout. And there is still radioactive rain. And so my point stands, I am afraid. No country is mad enough to risk nuclear contamination on its own land by attacking with nukes to a neighbour. Conventional weapons are good enough for destruction, if that is what one wants, and Israel certainly is in no shortage of those.